Cisco Exam 300-620 Topic 2 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-620 exam

Question #: 88
Topic #: 2

What is the advantage of implementing an active-active firewall cluster that is stretched across separate pods when anycast services are configured?

AA cluster is capable to be deployed in transparent mode across pods.

BA different MAC/IP configuration combination is configurable for the firewall in each pod.

CLocal traffic in a pod is load-balanced between the clustered firewalls.

DThe local pod anycast node is preferred by the local spines.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Brittney at Oct 19, 2024, 10:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-620 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Arlean

17 days ago

Transparent mode firewalls across pods? I just want my network to work, is that too much to ask?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ludivina

1 months ago

You know what they say, 'The local pod anycast node is always the preferred one.' Wait, they don't say that? Hmm, must be a new networking trend.

upvoted 0 times

Josephine

1 days ago

C) Local traffic in a pod is load-balanced between the clustered firewalls.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gayla

4 days ago

B) A different MAC/IP configuration combination is configurable for the firewall in each pod.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scot

24 days ago

A) A cluster is capable to be deployed in transparent mode across pods.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tandra

1 months ago

I'm all about that different MAC/IP config for each pod. Brings a whole new level of flexibility to the table.

upvoted 0 times

Belen

5 days ago

Absolutely, the advantage of implementing an active-active firewall cluster across separate pods with anycast services is clear.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

7 days ago

Plus, with local traffic load-balanced between the clustered firewalls, it helps optimize performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nina

9 days ago

Yes, it allows for more flexibility and customization based on the specific needs of each pod.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrie

29 days ago

I agree, having a different MAC/IP config for each pod is definitely a game changer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Macy

2 months ago

I agree with you, Bernadine. Having load-balancing between the firewalls can help distribute the traffic efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

2 months ago

Option C is the way to go. Load-balancing firewall clusters across pods? Sign me up for that efficiency!

upvoted 0 times

Franklyn

14 days ago

User 4: Definitely, having that level of load-balancing across pods can make a big difference in network performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

22 days ago

User 3: It's great to see how the active-active firewall cluster can handle traffic in such a balanced way.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bea

23 days ago

User 2: I agree, having the local traffic load-balanced between the clustered firewalls can really optimize performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tyisha

1 months ago

Option C is definitely the best choice. Load-balancing traffic between pods is key for efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernadine

2 months ago

I think the advantage is that local traffic in a pod is load-balanced between the clustered firewalls.

upvoted 0 times

...