Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-620 Topic 5 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-620 exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 5
[All 300-620 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Which two configurations enable inter-VRF communication? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lon
4 months ago
Wait, we're supposed to choose two options? I was just going to pick C and hope the grader had a good sense of humor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
4 months ago
I bet the exam writers just wanted to trick us with this one. Options C and E are the way to go - a classic 'import/export' solution.
upvoted 0 times
Jennie
3 months ago
Definitely, setting the contract scope to Tenant and subject scope to VRF should enable inter-VRF communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
3 months ago
I think you're right, importing and exporting contracts between VRFs is the key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
3 months ago
I agree, options C and E seem to be the most logical choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesusita
4 months ago
This question is a real head-scratcher. I might just go with 'all of the above' and hope for the best!
upvoted 0 times
Thurman
3 months ago
User1: Let's go with those then, good teamwork!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
3 months ago
User2: I agree, setting the subnet scope to Shared Between VRFs and exporting the contract seem like the right choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
3 months ago
User1: I think A and C are the correct configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pa
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Maybe options A and D? Sharing the subnet scope and changing the contract scope could work.
upvoted 0 times
Lenna
3 months ago
User2: I agree. Option D might also be needed to enable inter-VRF communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
3 months ago
User1: I think option A is correct. Setting the subnet scope to Shared Between VRFs makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
3 months ago
I agree, option D could also work. Changing the contract scope to Tenant might enable inter-VRF communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
4 months ago
User 2: I agree. Option D might also help with enabling inter-VRF communication by changing the contract scope to Tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
4 months ago
I think option A is correct. Setting the subnet scope to Shared Between VRFs makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
4 months ago
User 1: I think option A is correct. Setting the subnet scope to Shared Between VRFs makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosamond
4 months ago
Option B looks good to me. Enabling Advertise Externally should allow communication between VRFs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
5 months ago
I think options C and E are the correct choices. Exporting the contract and changing the subject scope to VRF should enable inter-VRF communication.
upvoted 0 times
Ranee
3 months ago
Exporting the contract and changing the subject scope to VRF should enable inter-VRF communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
4 months ago
I believe options C and E are the correct choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77