Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-620 Topic 6 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-620 exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 6
[All 300-620 Questions]

What is the advantage of implementing an active-active firewall cluster that is stretched across separate pods when anycast services are configured?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lisha
4 months ago
A transparent mode deployment across pods? Now that's just showing off! I'll stick with the practical advantages, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
Malinda
3 months ago
Local traffic load-balancing is definitely a practical advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
3 months ago
I agree, transparent mode deployment can be complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Benedict
4 months ago
Hmm, B is an interesting option, but I'm not sure if a different MAC/IP combo is really an advantage here. Let me think about this some more.
upvoted 0 times
Francine
3 months ago
Trina: That's a good point too. It's definitely a tough decision between C and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
4 months ago
I see your point, but I still think D is the most advantageous as it mentions the local pod anycast node being preferred by the local spines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scot
4 months ago
I think C is the best option because it mentions load-balancing local traffic between the clustered firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamal
4 months ago
I think the local pod anycast node being preferred by the local spines is a key advantage as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
4 months ago
I believe having different MAC/IP configuration for each pod is also beneficial for security reasons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
4 months ago
D sounds good too. The local pod anycast node being preferred by the local spines could also be an advantage of this setup.
upvoted 0 times
Evelynn
3 months ago
That's true, having the local pod anycast node preferred by the local spines can definitely be an advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
4 months ago
D) The local pod anycast node is preferred by the local spines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
4 months ago
C) Local traffic in a pod is load-balanced between the clustered firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
4 months ago
A) A cluster is capable to be deployed in transparent mode across pods.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeannine
5 months ago
I agree with Robt. It helps distribute the traffic efficiently within the pod.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
5 months ago
I think the answer is C. Load-balancing local traffic between the clustered firewalls makes the most sense for an active-active firewall setup across pods.
upvoted 0 times
Ardella
4 months ago
I think option D could also be a valid advantage, as the local pod anycast node being preferred by the local spines could improve efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
4 months ago
I agree, option C makes the most sense for load-balancing local traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Robt
5 months ago
I think the advantage is that local traffic in a pod is load-balanced between the clustered firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77