Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-635 Topic 1 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-635 exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 1
[All 300-635 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

When Cisco UCS is configured, which filter must be added to the str_filter string to retrieve all discovered compute blades with two CPUs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Becky
6 months ago
Hmm, D does seem reasonable too. I can see its rationale now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
6 months ago
I am leaning towards D, as it includes the number of CPUs and the discovery status with the right syntax.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
7 months ago
But 'type-sum' might not be the right attribute to filter by, I still think A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathryn
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B, as it includes 'type-sum' for the number of CPUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
7 months ago
I think the answer is A, because it specifies the number of CPUs and the discovery status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
8 months ago
Haha, I think option C is just trying to trick us. 'num_of_cpus eq <2' wouldn't give us the blades with exactly two CPUs.
upvoted 0 times
Chauncey
8 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
8 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
8 months ago
D
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
8 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
8 months ago
C
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
8 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
8 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. But what about the 'discovery' part? I'm a bit confused about the different options there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
8 months ago
Yeah, good point. I'm starting to get a headache just trying to decipher all these str_filter options. Maybe we should just ask the instructor for a cheat sheet, haha.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
8 months ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'm not entirely sure about the correct answer, as the str_filter syntax seems a bit unfamiliar to me.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77