Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-710 Topic 11 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-710 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 11
[All 300-710 Questions]

What is the result when two users modify a VPN policy at the same lime on a Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center managed device?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

In Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC), when two users attempt to modify a VPN policy simultaneously, the system implements a locking mechanism to prevent conflicts. The first user who selects edit on the policy locks the configuration, preventing other users from making changes until the lock is released.

Steps:

When the first user selects edit on the VPN policy, FMC locks the policy for editing.

The lock ensures that only the first user can make changes.

Once the first user saves or cancels their changes, the lock is released.

Other users can then edit the policy.

This locking mechanism ensures that configuration conflicts are avoided and only one set of changes is applied at a time.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Dean
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of collaborative editing. I'm betting on B - the first user locks the configuration to maintain control. Gotta love that Cisco efficiency!
upvoted 0 times
Glendora
25 days ago
User 3: Agreed, Cisco knows how to handle collaborative editing efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to maintain control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
1 months ago
I think B is correct, the first user locks the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daren
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the Cisco engineers were hoping to avoid the 'too many cooks in the kitchen' problem with this one. Gotta go with D for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
2 months ago
Wait, what if they both try to edit at the same time and the system just explodes? That would be a real plot twist!
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
2 months ago
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is D. The system should prevent modifications to the policy by multiple users to avoid conflicts and ensure consistency.
upvoted 0 times
Zack
26 days ago
It's important for security reasons to have a system in place that prevents simultaneous modifications by multiple users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 months ago
Yes, that's correct. It helps avoid conflicts and maintain consistency in the policy configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
2 months ago
I think you're right. The system should prevent multiple users from modifying the policy at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erin
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the system prevents modifications by multiple users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kelvin
3 months ago
I believe the changes from both users will be merged together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
3 months ago
I think the first user locks the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77