Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 300-710 Topic 3 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-710 exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 3
[All 300-710 Questions]

A network administrator reviews me attack risk report and notices several Low-Impact attacks. What does this type of attack indicate?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

A low-impact attack indicates that the host is not vulnerable to those attacks.A low-impact attack is an attack that does not exploit any known vulnerability on the target host or does not match any signature or anomaly rule on the FTD device5. A low-impact attack does not mean that the attack is not dangerous to the network or that the host is not within the administrator's environment. It simply means that the attack did not succeed in compromising or affecting the host.

The other options are incorrect because:

All attacks are not listed as low until manually categorized.The FTD device automatically assigns an impact level to each attack based on various factors, such as vulnerability information, threat score, and confidence rating5. The impact level can be high, medium, or low, depending on how likely and how severe the attack is.

The attacks are not necessarily harmless to the network.A low-impact attack may still cause some damage or disruption to the network, such as consuming bandwidth, generating noise, or distracting attention from other attacks6.A low-impact attack may also indicate that the attacker is probing or scanning the network for potential vulnerabilities or weaknesses7.

The host is not necessarily outside the administrator's environment. A low-impact attack can target any host on the network, regardless of its location or ownership. A low-impact attack does not imply that the host is external or irrelevant to the administrator's environment.


by King at Jun 03, 2024, 05:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-710 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Helga
4 months ago
This question is a real low-impact attack on my brain. I'm going to go with C and hope the network is as tough as my skull!
upvoted 0 times
Jenifer
3 months ago
User 3: I agree, it's probably just a minor threat to the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
3 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. Low-Impact attacks shouldn't cause too much harm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
3 months ago
User 1: I think the attacks are not dangerous to the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Maybe the network is just so secure that even low-impact attacks can't get a foothold. Gotta love that iron-clad defense!
upvoted 0 times
Launa
3 months ago
C) The attacks are not dangerous to the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
3 months ago
B) The host is not vulnerable to those attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
3 months ago
A) All attacks are listed as low until manually categorized.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Olga
4 months ago
But could they still pose a risk if left unchecked?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
4 months ago
Yeah, I believe they are not a major threat to the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
4 months ago
I think low-impact attacks are not dangerous, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
4 months ago
I'm going with B. The host must not be vulnerable to those attacks, so they're not a big deal. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
4 months ago
Definitely C. If the attacks are low-impact, they're not a major concern for the network. The administrator can breathe a sigh of relief!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. Low-impact attacks are not dangerous to the network, so the administrator can focus on more serious threats.
upvoted 0 times
Adaline
3 months ago
Yes, it's good that the administrator can prioritize more serious threats instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
3 months ago
I agree, low-impact attacks are not a major concern for the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
3 months ago
C: Yeah, it's important to prioritize and address the most critical risks first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
3 months ago
B: That makes sense. It's good to know that those attacks are not a major threat.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brunilda
3 months ago
Yes, it's good to prioritize the more serious threats first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
4 months ago
A: I think the correct answer is C. Low-impact attacks are not dangerous to the network, so the administrator can focus on more serious threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
4 months ago
I agree, low-impact attacks are not a major concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77