Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-710 Topic 6 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-710 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 6
[All 300-710 Questions]

A network engineer is deploying a pair of Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense devices managed by Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center tor High Availability Internet access is a high priority for the business and therefore they have invested in internet circuits from two different ISPs. The requirement from the customer Is that Internet access must do available to their user's oven if one of the ISPs is down. Which two features must be deployed to achieve this requirement? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

To ensure high availability of internet access when deploying a pair of Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) devices managed by Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC), the following features must be deployed:

Route Tracking: This feature monitors the reachability of a specified target (such as an external IP address) through the configured routes. If the route to the target is lost, the FTD can dynamically adjust the routing to use an alternate path, ensuring continuous internet access.

SLA Monitor: Service Level Agreement (SLA) monitoring works alongside route tracking to continuously verify the status and performance of the internet links. If the SLA for one of the ISP links fails (indicating the link is down or underperforming), the FTD can switch traffic to the secondary ISP link.

Steps to configure:

In FMC, navigate to Devices > Device Management.

Select the FTD device and configure route tracking to monitor the ISP links.

Configure SLA monitors to continuously check the health and performance of the internet circuits.

These configurations ensure that internet access remains available to users even if one of the ISPs goes down.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Marisha
28 days ago
Redundant interfaces and BGP, baby! That's the answer, no doubt. I'm practically a network engineer already.
upvoted 0 times
Shawnda
15 days ago
You're right, those two features will definitely help ensure internet access even if one ISP goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
16 days ago
Redundant interfaces and BGP are the way to go for high availability internet access.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Launa
1 months ago
Wait, what? Isn't this just a fancy way of asking about high availability? I'm going with D and E, gotta love that redundancy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
1 months ago
I'm feeling lucky, let's try A and C. EtherChannel and SLA Monitor should do the trick, no need to overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
Lavonda
18 days ago
C) SLA Monitor
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
19 days ago
A) EtherChannel interfaces
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryanne
1 months ago
I'm not sure about Route Tracking. I think SLA Monitor could also be a good option to ensure Internet access availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tesha
2 months ago
Aha, I know this one! It's definitely B and D. Route Tracking to monitor the links, and Redundant interfaces to keep the traffic flowing.
upvoted 0 times
Ira
6 days ago
So, the correct features to deploy for high availability Internet access are Route Tracking, Redundant interfaces, and SLA Monitor. Thanks for the clarification!
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
9 days ago
That's a good point, SLA Monitor will help ensure Internet access remains available even if one of the ISPs goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
13 days ago
I think we also need to configure SLA Monitor to track the health of the ISPs, not just Route Tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
22 days ago
Yes, you're right! Route Tracking will monitor the links and Redundant interfaces will ensure traffic keeps flowing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dannie
2 months ago
I agree with you, Dierdre. Route Tracking will help in monitoring the status of the ISPs and Redundant interfaces will ensure availability even if one ISP is down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
2 months ago
I think we need to deploy Route Tracking and Redundant interfaces to achieve this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
2 months ago
Hmm, this looks tricky. I'm gonna go with D and E - can't have too much redundancy, right?
upvoted 0 times
Marge
28 days ago
User4: It's important to have a backup plan in case one of the ISPs goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
1 months ago
User3: Definitely, those two features will help maintain high availability for Internet access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
2 months ago
User2: Agreed, having redundant interfaces and using BGP will ensure Internet access is always available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
2 months ago
User1: I think D and E are the way to go for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77