Cisco Exam 300-710 Topic 9 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-710 exam

Question #: 80
Topic #: 9

An engineer defines a new rule while configuring an Access Control Policy. After deploying the policy, the rule is not working as expected and the hit counters associated with the rule are showing zero. What is causing this error?

ALogging is not enabled for the rule.

BThe rule was not enabled after being created.

CThe wrong source interface for Snort was selected in the rule.

DAn incorrect application signature was used in the rule.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Mitsue at Feb 08, 2024, 11:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-710 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Mari

6 months ago

It's possible, but I still think the source interface is more likely the culprit here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarah

7 months ago

I don't think so, I'm leaning towards the logging not being enabled for the rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elinore

7 months ago

But what about the application signature used in the rule? Could that be the problem?

upvoted 0 times

...

Amber

7 months ago

I agree with user Tiera, it's likely the wrong interface was selected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiera

7 months ago

No, I believe the issue is with the source interface for Snort.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrie

7 months ago

I think the rule was not enabled after being created.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johana

8 months ago

Ah, the old 'incorrect application signature' trick. I've seen that one before. It's always a good idea to double-check the details when configuring these rules.

upvoted 0 times

Paola

8 months ago

Ah, the old 'incorrect application signature' trick. I've seen that one before. It's always a good idea to double-check the details when configuring these rules.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linn

8 months ago

D) An incorrect application signature was used in the rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilson

8 months ago

C) The wrong source interface for Snort was selected in the rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catina

8 months ago

B) The rule was not enabled after being created.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thomasena

8 months ago

A) Logging is not enabled for the rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jin

8 months ago

I don't know, guys. What if the engineer selected the wrong source interface for Snort? That could also lead to the rule not working as expected and the hit counters showing zero.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aileen

8 months ago

You make a good point. But I'm leaning more towards the rule not being enabled after creation. That would definitely cause the hit counters to show zero, even if the rule is properly configured.

upvoted 0 times

...

Giuseppe

8 months ago

Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I think the logging issue could be the culprit here. If logging is not enabled, we won't be able to see the hit counters, even if the rule is working correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...