You know, I was actually thinking the large deployment model might be the way to go. If we're talking 50,000 endpoints, that's a huge network. Might as well go all-in with the distributed approach, right? *chuckles* Go big or go home, am I right?
Hmm, that's a good point. I'm leaning towards the medium deployment with dedicated PSNs. That way you can scale out the processing power as needed without overloading the primary and secondary nodes.
Yeah, I agree. With over 50,000 concurrent active endpoints, a small deployment with just a primary and secondary node running all personas would probably not be able to handle the load.
This question seems pretty straightforward, but it's important to really understand the different deployment models and their use cases. For an enterprise that large, I think we can rule out the small deployment option right away.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Dick
8 months agoJade
8 months agoAlbert
8 months agoIndia
8 months ago