Haha, I was just about to say the same thing. Option C seems to be the most logical choice here. Though I have to admit, I'm a bit worried about remembering all these little ISE deployment details.
You guys are on the right track. I think the key here is that in a standalone ISE node, the personas are enabled by default and can't be edited. So I'm going with option C.
I agree, this question is focusing on the restrictions of a standalone ISE node deployment. From what I know, the domain name and hostname of the node can't be changed after installation, so I'm leaning towards options B and D.
Hmm, this question seems to test our understanding of Cisco ISE node deployment options. I'm not entirely sure about the answer, but I think it has something to do with the limitations of a standalone ISE node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Kimberely
6 months agoRyann
6 months agoAntonio
7 months agoTammy
7 months agoLasandra
8 months agoShawnna
8 months agoTrina
8 months agoJackie
8 months agoGeorgeanna
8 months agoLoreta
8 months agoClaudia
8 months agoKeneth
8 months agoTammy
8 months agoRozella
8 months ago