Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-720 Topic 10 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-720 exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 10
[All 300-720 Questions]

A trusted partner of an organization recently experienced a new campaign that was leveraging JavaScript attachments to trick users into executing malware. As a result, they created a local policy to deny messages with JavaScript attachments. Which action should the administrator of the organization take to ensure encrypted communications are delivered to the intended partner recipient?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Zana
2 months ago
Haha, can you imagine if the administrator just starts randomly inserting headers? That's a surefire way to create more problems. I'd stick with option D, keep it simple.
upvoted 0 times
Ashton
26 days ago
Fletcher: Absolutely, no need to overcomplicate things when it comes to security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
28 days ago
User 3: Yeah, keeping it simple is usually the best approach in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
29 days ago
User 2: Definitely, option D seems like the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, inserting random headers sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dalene
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but option D also sounds like a valid choice to ensure encrypted communications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
3 months ago
I agree with Katina, creating an outgoing content filter seems like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
3 months ago
I think the administrator should go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
3 months ago
I agree with Cletus. D seems like the most straightforward solution to address the problem. No need to get overly complicated here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
3 months ago
Hmm, I think option D is the way to go. Deselecting the 'Use-Script' envelope settings sounds like the best way to ensure encrypted communications are delivered without the JavaScript issue.
upvoted 0 times
Laticia
2 months ago
Definitely, option D sounds like the most secure solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
2 months ago
Agreed, that should ensure encrypted communications are delivered without any JavaScript problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
2 months ago
Yeah, deselecting the 'Use-Script' envelope settings seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
2 months ago
I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77