Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-720 Topic 15 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-720 exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 15
[All 300-720 Questions]

An administrator notices that the Cisco Secure Email Gateway delivery queue on an appliance is consistently full. After further investigation, it is determined that the IP addresses currently in use by appliance are being rate-limited by some destinations. The administrator creates a new interface with an additional IP address using virtual gateway technology, but the issue is not solved Which configuration change resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ricki
8 months ago
Agreed, I think Option C is the way to go. Now let's just hope the exam doesn't throw us a curveball and have a trick answer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
8 months ago
I'm still a bit confused, but I think Option C makes the most sense based on the information provided. The question specifically mentions 'alt-src-host', so that seems like the right command to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
8 months ago
Ha, I just had a thought - maybe we could use the 'alt-src-host' command to set the new interface as a delivery candidate, and then use the 'loadbalance auto' command to spread the load across all the interfaces. That could be a clever solution!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
8 months ago
Ooh, that's an interesting idea! I'm leaning towards Option C as the best answer, but I'm still not 100% sure. Anyone have any other thoughts?
upvoted 0 times
Shawana
8 months ago
F: Agreed. Option D seems like the most logical solution to the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
8 months ago
E: Sounds like a plan. Let's implement Option D and monitor the delivery queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
8 months ago
D: Let's go with Option D then and see if it resolves the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
8 months ago
C: I see your point. Maybe I'll give Option D a try first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
8 months ago
B: I think Option D might actually be the better choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
8 months ago
A: Option C seems reasonable, but have you considered Option D as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77