Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-720 Topic 16 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-720 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 16
[All 300-720 Questions]

The company security policy requires that the finance department have an easy way to apply encryption to their outbound messages that contain sensitive data Users must be able to flag the messages that require encryption versus a Cisco Secure Email Gateway appliance scanning all messages and automatically encrypting via detection Which action enables this capability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

According to the [Cisco Secure Email Encryption Service Add-In User Guide], you can create an encryption profile that defines the encryption settings and options for your encrypted messages[2, p. 11]. You can also create an outgoing content filter that applies the encryption profile to the messages that match certain conditions, such as having [SECURE] in the subject header[2, p. 12]. This way, you can allow users to flag the messages that require encryption by adding [SECURE] to the subject line.

The other options are not valid because:

A) Creating an encryption profile with [SECURE] in the Subject setting and enabling encryption on the mail flow policy will not work, as the Subject setting in the encryption profile is used to specify the subject line of the encrypted message envelope, not the original message[2, p. 11].

B) Creating an outgoing content filter with no conditions and with the Encrypt and Deliver Now action configured with [SECURE] in the Subject setting will not work, as this will encrypt all outgoing messages regardless of whether they have [SECURE] in the subject line or not[2, p. 12].

D) Creating a DLP policy manager message action with encryption enabled and applying it to active DLP policies for outgoing mail will not work, as this will encrypt messages based on DLP rules that detect sensitive data in the message content, not based on user flags in the subject line.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ruby
3 months ago
That's a good point, Selma. Maybe we should review the options again to make sure we pick the best one for the finance department.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but D seems like a possible solution with the DLP policy manager message action for encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C since it mentions creating an encryption profile and an outgoing content filter with the [SECURE] condition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
3 months ago
I think the answer is B because it involves creating an outgoing content filter with the Encrypt and Deliver Now action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
3 months ago
I see your point, simplicity could be key in this scenario
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
3 months ago
True, but maybe option A is simpler and easier to implement in the finance department
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
4 months ago
But option C specifically mentions [SECURE] in the Subject Header, which seems important
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D, the DLP policy manager seems more secure
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
5 months ago
I think the answer is A
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
6 months ago
You know, I was totally going to pick option D, but now I'm having second thoughts. Seems like a bit of overkill to set up a whole DLP policy just for this. Plus, the users want an easy way to do it themselves.
upvoted 0 times
Justine
5 months ago
Let's go with Option A then. It's straightforward and meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
5 months ago
Good point, User 1. Option A does seem like the most direct solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
5 months ago
Yeah, but Option A specifically mentions enabling encryption on the mail flow policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
5 months ago
I think Option C might be a good choice too. It includes the [SECURE] tag in the Subject Header.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
5 months ago
I agree with you, User 1. Option A seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
5 months ago
Option A sounds like the best choice. It's simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alonzo
6 months ago
I was leaning towards option B at first, but I see your point about it not giving the users the ability to flag the messages themselves. C definitely seems like the most user-friendly approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
6 months ago
Yeah, I agree with Shawn. Option C is the most straightforward solution that meets the requirements. The other options either don't give the users enough control, or involve more complex setup with DLP policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
6 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I think option C is the way to go here. Creating an encryption profile and an outgoing content filter with the [SECURE] subject condition seems like the easiest way to give the finance department the control they need over encryption, without having the appliance scanning everything.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77