Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-720 Topic 6 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-720 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 6
[All 300-720 Questions]

A Cisco Secure Email Gateway administrator recently enabled the Outbreak Filters Global Service Setting to detect Viral as well as Non-Viral threat detection, with no detection of Non-viral threats after 24 hours of monitoring Outbreak Filters What is the reason that Non-Viral threat detection is not detecting any positive verdicts?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

According to the [Cisco Secure Email User Guide], Non-Viral threat detection is a feature of Outbreak Filters that detects and blocks email messages that contain non-viral threats such as phishing, fraud, or social engineering[1, p. 25]. To use this feature, you need to enable either AntiSpam or Intelligent Multi-Scan on your Cisco Secure Email Gateway, as these features provide the necessary scanning and filtering capabilities for Non-Viral threat detection[1, p. 26].

The other options are not valid because:

A) Non-Viral threat detection does not require Antivirus or AMP enablement to properly function. Antivirus and AMP are features that detect and block email messages that contain viral threats such as malware or ransomware[1, p. 27-28].

B) The Outbreak Filters option Graymail Header does not affect Non-Viral threat detection. Graymail Header is an option that allows you to add a header to email messages that are classified as graymail, which are messages that are not spam but may be unwanted by some recipients, such as newsletters or promotions[1, p. 25].

D) The Outbreak Filters option URL Rewriting does not affect Non-Viral threat detection. URL Rewriting is an option that allows you to rewrite the URLs in email messages to point to a Cisco proxy server, which can scan the URLs for malicious content and redirect the users to a warning page if needed[1, p. 25].


Contribute your Thoughts:

Chandra
6 months ago
I think the reason Non-Viral threat detection is not working is because it requires AntiSpam or Intelligent Multi-Scan enablement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
6 months ago
I'm not sure, but maybe the Outbreak Filters option Graymail Header must be enabled for Non-Viral threat detection to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicki
6 months ago
I agree with Sharee, Non-Viral threat detection definitely needs Antivirus or AMP enablement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
6 months ago
I think the reason Non-Viral threat detection is not detecting any positive verdicts is because it requires Antivirus or AMP enablement to properly function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
6 months ago
That's a good point, Maybe the Graymail Header setting is necessary for Non-Viral threat detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
7 months ago
I'm not so sure, maybe the Outbreak Filters option Graymail Header must be enabled to detect Non-Viral threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
7 months ago
I agree with Non-Viral threat detection could be dependent on Antivirus or AMP enablement to function properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
7 months ago
I think the reason Non-Viral threat detection is not detecting any positive verdicts is because it requires Antivirus or AMP enablement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
8 months ago
Haha, 'your money's on C', eh? I like your confidence, but I'm not so sure. What if it's actually option A - 'Non-Viral threat detection requires Antivirus or AMP enablement to properly function'? That would make more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Elouise
7 months ago
I agree with Olive, option A seems like the most logical choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
7 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B - The Outbreak Filters option Graymail Header must be enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
7 months ago
But what about option C - Non-Viral threat detection requires AntiSpam or Intelligent Multi-Scan enablement to properly function?
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
7 months ago
I think option A - Non-Viral threat detection requires Antivirus or AMP enablement to properly function makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alaine
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I feel like I need to go back and review the Outbreak Filters documentation to make sure I'm understanding it correctly. Anyone have a good study guide they can share?
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
8 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. The question states that Non-Viral threat detection is not working, so the answer must be related to that specific functionality. My money's on option C - 'Non-Viral threat detection requires AntiSpam or Intelligent Multi-Scan enablement to properly function.'
upvoted 0 times
Kattie
8 months ago
Let's double check and see if enabling AntiSpam or Intelligent Multi-Scan solves the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
8 months ago
It's possible that without those settings, the Non-Viral threats are not being detected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
8 months ago
Yes, let's make sure those settings are configured correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
8 months ago
Should we check if AntiSpam or Intelligent Multi-Scan is properly enabled?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherron
8 months ago
I agree, those settings are crucial for Non-Viral threat detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
8 months ago
I think the issue might be with the AntiSpam or Intelligent Multi-Scan settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vanesa
8 months ago
I agree, the question could be worded a bit more clearly. But from what I can gather, it sounds like the administrator has enabled Viral and Non-Viral threat detection, yet only Viral threats are being detected. That's certainly a strange issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
8 months ago
Haha, I bet the Cisco engineers had a good laugh when they came up with this question. They really want to make sure we understand the ins and outs of the Outbreak Filters, don't they?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A. Non-Viral threat detection requires Antivirus or AMP enablement to properly function. That seems like a reasonable requirement for the Outbreak Filters to work effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
8 months ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'm not sure if I fully understand the scenario being described here. Does the Outbreak Filters Global Service Setting only detect Viral threats, and we're supposed to figure out why it's not detecting Non-Viral threats?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
8 months ago
Ah, I see. So the Outbreak Filters are only detecting viral threats, and not non-viral ones. That makes sense, but I'm not sure why that would be the case. Maybe we need to dig deeper into the configuration settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
8 months ago
I think the answer might be C. Non-Viral threat detection requires AntiSpam or Intelligent Multi-Scan enablement to properly function. That sounds like the most logical explanation to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
8 months ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'm not sure if I'm fully comfortable with the Outbreak Filters feature and how it works with non-viral threats.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77