Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-730 Topic 4 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-730 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 4
[All 300-730 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer is diagnosing an issue that occurred after a router at a branch site was assigned a new address. Based on the debugs, what must be done to resolve this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cherry
2 months ago
B) Gotta love it when the answer is as straightforward as a good old preshared key match-up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
2 months ago
Hey, at least it's not an issue with the remote peer's IP address. That would be a real headache!
upvoted 0 times
Derrick
1 months ago
Hey, at least it's not an issue with the remote peer's IP address. That would be a real headache!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
1 months ago
C) Ensure that the UDP 500 packets between devices are not dropped.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
B) Ensure that the correct preshared keys are set on both sides.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
2 months ago
A) Add the remote peer's IP address to the server's IKEv2 keyring.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerald
2 months ago
B) Bingo! Preshared keys are the key to unlocking this puzzle, no pun intended.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
3 months ago
D) Nah, the remote peer's identity is not the problem here. It's all about the preshared keys, my friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
3 months ago
C) Checking the UDP 500 port connectivity is also important, but the primary issue seems to be the preshared keys mismatch.
upvoted 0 times
Jade
2 months ago
C) Checking the UDP 500 port connectivity is also important, but the primary issue seems to be the preshared keys mismatch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
2 months ago
B) Ensure that the correct preshared keys are set on both sides.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
2 months ago
A) Add the remote peer's IP address to the server's IKEv2 keyring.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yuonne
3 months ago
I believe D is the correct answer, adding the remote peer's identity to the server's IKEv2 profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
3 months ago
B) Definitely the correct answer. Matching the preshared keys on both sides is crucial for a successful IKEv2 negotiation.
upvoted 0 times
Corrina
3 months ago
No, the correct answer is to ensure that the correct preshared keys are set on both sides.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
3 months ago
I think we need to add the remote peer's IP address to the server's IKEv2 keyring.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joanna
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C could also be a possible solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
4 months ago
I agree with Lorean, we need to ensure the preshared keys are correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
4 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77