Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-810 Topic 1 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-810 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 1
[All 300-810 Questions]

Which option is a prerequisite for selecting a third -party IdP for Cisco Collaboration?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) is a widely used standard for single sign-on (SSO) and is a prerequisite for using a third-party identity provider (IdP) with Cisco Collaboration applications. While other options might be related to authentication protocols, SAML 2.0 is the current standard supported by Cisco for integration with third-party IdPs.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Junita
3 months ago
I believe SAML 1.1 might work, but SAML 2.0 is more secure and widely supported.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
3 months ago
But isn't SAML 1.1 also a valid option for Cisco Collaboration?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
4 months ago
I agree with Emma, SAML 2.0 makes sense for third-party IdP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
4 months ago
I think the prerequisite is SAML 2.0.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
5 months ago
I believe SAML 2.0 offers better security and functionality compared to SAML 1.0 or 1.1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
5 months ago
But what about SAML 1.0 or 1.1? Could those be alternatives?
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
5 months ago
I agree with Leslee, SAML 2.0 seems to be the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
5 months ago
I think the prerequisite is using SAML 2.0 for third-party IdP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
6 months ago
Ooh, I know this one! If I remember correctly, SAML 2.0 is the prerequisite for selecting a third-party IdP for Cisco Collaboration. It's the most widely adopted version of the SAML protocol.
upvoted 0 times
Arlean
4 months ago
Positive. SAML 2.0 is the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreen
5 months ago
I thought it was SAML 1.0. Are you sure about that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
5 months ago
Yes, you're right! SAML 2.0 is indeed the prerequisite for selecting a third-party IdP for Cisco Collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaun
6 months ago
Ah, I see what you're getting at. SAML 2.0 is definitely the way to go. It's like the Beyoncé of identity protocols - everyone loves it and it's the industry standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
6 months ago
Hmm, let me think about this. I believe SAML 2.0 is the more recent and commonly used standard for identity federation, so that might be a good option. But I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
6 months ago
Yeah, me neither. I've been studying the material, but I'm still a bit unsure about the different identity protocols and how they apply in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
6 months ago
Come on, guys, this is an easy one. SAML 2.0 is the way to go. It's the latest and greatest version, and it's what all the cool kids are using these days.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. I know SAML is used for identity federation, but I can't remember which version is the most common. Maybe I should review my notes again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
6 months ago
This question seems a bit tricky. I'm not sure if I understand the prerequisites for selecting a third-party IdP for Cisco Collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
6 months ago
Yep, SAML 2.0 is definitely the way to go. I remember learning about it in my security classes. It's the standard for modern identity federation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
6 months ago
I agree, SAML 2.0 is the way to go. LDAP is more of an authentication protocol, while SAML 1.0 and 1.1 are older versions that aren't as widely used these days.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
6 months ago
Hmm, this question seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is SAML 2.0, since that's the most widely adopted and supported version of the SAML protocol for identity federation.
upvoted 0 times
Willodean
5 months ago
Not at the moment, but I'll keep that in mind.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
5 months ago
Is there anything else you need assistance with?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
5 months ago
No problem, happy to help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
5 months ago
I understand now, thanks for clarifying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
5 months ago
Yes, SAML 2.0 is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
5 months ago
SAML 2.0
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77