Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-810 Topic 3 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-810 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 3
[All 300-810 Questions]

An engineer is informed that high availability for a Cisco IM and Presence server fails While the engineer examines the Cisco UCM presence redundancy group in the Ul. they discover that the first .. is in the Idle state, and the second node is in the running in backup mode state Which action must the engineer take to place both nodes back in the normal state?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The scenario indicates a high availability failover condition for a Cisco IM and Presence server: one node is idle, the other is running in backup mode. To restore both nodes to normal operation, initiating a controlled failover is the best approach:

Failover Action:This will gracefully switch the active role to the idle node, making it primary and restoring redundancy.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Kimberlie
5 months ago
I bet the engineer's thinking, 'If only I had a magic wand to make this problem disappear.' Oh, wait, that's what the Fallback option is for!
upvoted 0 times
Lettie
3 months ago
D) Reinstall the first node of the IM and Presence server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
3 months ago
C) Click Fallback in the Server Action field
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
4 months ago
B) Restart the first node of the IM and Presence server
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
4 months ago
A) Click Failover in the Server Action field
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Oren
5 months ago
Failover, really? That's like trying to put out a fire with gasoline. C'mon, the answer's gotta be Fallback, no brainer!
upvoted 0 times
Mabelle
3 months ago
No way, restarting could cause more issues. Fallback is the safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
3 months ago
But what if that doesn't work? Maybe we should restart the first node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
3 months ago
I think the answer is Fallback, it makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
4 months ago
No way, restarting the first node could cause more issues. Fallback is the safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
4 months ago
But what if that doesn't work? Maybe we should consider restarting the first node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
4 months ago
I think the answer is Fallback, it makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynelle
5 months ago
I think reinstalling the first node of the IM and Presence server might be necessary in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
5 months ago
Reinstall the first node? That's overkill. I'd rather not become the server's personal IT support, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
5 months ago
Restarting the first node? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Let's go with the option that actually fixes the issue.
upvoted 0 times
Taryn
4 months ago
Let's go with option C) Click Fallback in the Server Action field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
4 months ago
Restarting the first node won't solve the issue, we need to trigger a failover or fallback action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
5 months ago
C) Click Fallback in the Server Action field
upvoted 0 times
...
German
5 months ago
A) Click Failover in the Server Action field
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yoko
5 months ago
Hmm, looks like the engineer needs to click Fallback to get both nodes back in the normal state. Simple enough, right?
upvoted 0 times
Gracia
4 months ago
I agree, that's the right action to take in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
5 months ago
Yes, clicking Fallback should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antonette
5 months ago
But wouldn't clicking Fallback in the Server Action field also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe restarting the first node of the IM and Presence server is the best action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
6 months ago
I think the engineer should click Failover in the Server Action field.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77