Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-810 Topic 3 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-810 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 3
[All 300-810 Questions]

An engineer in a company have access to voice calling and voicemail from desktop phones As the company transitions to remote work, users are utilizing the Cisco Jabber client through Mobile and Remote .. to access company phone services. Users cannot access voicemail through the Cisco Jabber client, even though voicemail is functioning in the office on the desk phone. Cisco Jabber works IM and Presence, including calling through Mobile and Remote Access What is the cause of the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The scenario indicates that Cisco Jabber clients used over Mobile and Remote Access (MRA) cannot access voicemail, even though the feature works perfectly from desk phones. This strongly suggests a missing integration between Cisco Unity Connection and internal Cisco UCM clusters. Here's why:

MRA and Cisco Unity Connection:Jabber clients using MRA often rely on integration with Cisco Unity Connection on the internal network for voicemail access.


Contribute your Thoughts:

German
2 months ago
You know, this reminds me of that time I tried to access my work voicemail from my personal phone. Needless to say, it didn't go well. Technology can be tricky sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
2 months ago
Oh, I see. The Cisco Unity Connection needs to be integrated with the Cisco UCM clusters for the voicemail functionality to work with Cisco Jabber. I hope the engineers can fix that quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erin
2 months ago
Hmm, I think the issue is that the Cisco Unity Connection is missing from the internal Cisco UCM clusters. That would definitely prevent access to voicemail through Cisco Jabber.
upvoted 0 times
Gilma
1 months ago
Could it be missing from the Expressway-E clusters for external communication?
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
1 months ago
D) Cisco Unity Connection is missing from the Expressway-E clusters for external communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
1 months ago
User 2: Maybe it's also missing from the Expressway-C clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
1 months ago
C) Cisco Unity Connection is missing from the internal Cisco UCM clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
1 months ago
User 1: I think the issue is that Cisco Unity Connection is missing from the internal Cisco UCM clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
1 months ago
B) Cisco Unity Connection is missing from the internal Expressway-C clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
2 months ago
C) Cisco Unity Connection is missing from the internal Cisco UCM clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
2 months ago
B) Cisco Unity Connection is missing from the internal Expressway-C clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
2 months ago
A) Cisco Unity Connection is missing from the internal Cisco UCM clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
2 months ago
A) Cisco Unity Connection is missing from the internal Cisco UCM clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anthony
2 months ago
I don't think so, because the problem seems to be with accessing voicemail internally, not externally.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
3 months ago
But what about the Expressway-E clusters for external communication? Could that be the cause of the issue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
3 months ago
I agree with Anthony, it makes sense that the voicemail access problem is related to the internal Cisco UCM clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
3 months ago
I think the issue might be with Cisco Unity Connection missing from the internal Cisco UCM clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77