Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-815 Topic 10 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-815 exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 10
[All 300-815 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit. An engineer is troubleshooting an issue where inbound Calls are failing after they transferred. The provider reports that update is not supported, and this is causing the calls to fail. Which command should resolve this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Nichelle
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the engineer is having a headache with this one. I'd go with D, '100rel' seems like the right way to handle the unsupported update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
3 months ago
This is a classic troubleshooting scenario. I'm going to go with D, '100rel', it sounds like the best option to resolve the call transfer issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
3 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards B, no update-callerId, since the issue is with the caller ID update causing the calls to fail.
upvoted 0 times
Scarlet
2 months ago
Let's try that command and see if it fixes the problem with the calls failing after transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
3 months ago
I think you're right, B, no update-callerId should resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Penney
3 months ago
I think the answer is D. The provider said the update is not supported, so we need to use the '100rel' option to ensure the signaling is handled correctly.
upvoted 0 times
Titus
2 months ago
Let's try using the '100rel' option to see if it fixes the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
3 months ago
I agree, option D '100rel' should resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adell
3 months ago
I think C) no contact-passig could also be a valid option to resolve the issue, as it may be related to contact information passing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
3 months ago
I'm not sure about D, I think A) no midcall-signaling passthru could also be a possible solution to the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
4 months ago
I agree with Quentin, D) rel1xx require ''100rel'' seems like the correct command to resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
4 months ago
I think the answer is D) rel1xx require ''100rel'' because it requires reliable provisional responses.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77