Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-815 Topic 13 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-815 exam
Question #: 101
Topic #: 13
[All 300-815 Questions]

An engineer configures several calling party transformation patterns in Cisco UCM so that calling numbers are shown in the +E.164 format. The route patterns match seven-digit internal numbers and prefix the numbers with 1408. The SIP trunk matches 1408XXXXXXX and prefixes the number with +. When users make outbound calls, the calling number still shows as seven digits. What is the cause of this problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Denny
12 days ago
Well, this is a tricky one. I bet the engineer is scratching their head trying to figure out why the seven-digit numbers are still showing up. Maybe they should try turning it off and on again?
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
20 days ago
Haha, looks like the engineer just forgot to use their crystal ball to foresee this problem. Can't blame them though, those things are pretty unreliable.
upvoted 0 times
Ashleigh
11 days ago
A) The calling transformation on the SIP trunk is applied first, and then the calling transformation on the route patterns is applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reid
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure the issue is with the calling transformations themselves. It might be that the engineer needs to apply a transformation at the route group level as well.
upvoted 0 times
Tegan
5 days ago
D) The engineer must also apply a calling transformation at the route group details level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
23 days ago
C) The calling transformation on the route patterns is ignored because there is already a calling transformation on the SIP trunk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
24 days ago
A) The calling transformation on the SIP trunk is applied first, and then the calling transformation on the route patterns is applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felix
1 months ago
I think the problem is that the calling transformation on the SIP trunk is being applied first, overriding the transformation on the route patterns. The order of operations is key here.
upvoted 0 times
Carin
24 days ago
Maybe the engineer needs to adjust the order of the transformations to fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
26 days ago
Option C) The calling transformation on the route patterns is ignored because there is already a calling transformation on the SIP trunk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
1 months ago
That makes sense. The order of operations is important in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adria
1 months ago
Option A) The calling transformation on the SIP trunk is applied first, and then the calling transformation on the route patterns is applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louisa
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the issue lies with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
2 months ago
I think the cause of the problem is option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77