Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-820 Topic 17 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-820 exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 17
[All 300-820 Questions]

Which complication does a NAT introduce in SDP for a SIP call?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alesia
8 months ago
I'm not so sure about option C. I was thinking option A might be the correct answer. The additional headers from NAT encapsulation could cause the packet size to exceed the MTU, leading to fragmentation and other issues.
upvoted 0 times
Theodora
8 months ago
Option A seems to be the consensus choice for the complication introduced by NAT in SDP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
8 months ago
Agreed, the impact on packet size due to NAT encapsulation is a common issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
8 months ago
I think option A is the most likely scenario in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
8 months ago
Yes, fragmentation due to packet size exceeding MTU is definitely a concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
8 months ago
True, but if the packet size exceeds the MTU, that could lead to further complications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
8 months ago
But option C raises a valid point too. The IP address specified may indeed be unrouteable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
8 months ago
I agree, option A seems plausible. The extra headers from NAT could definitely impact packet size.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
8 months ago
Yeah, I agree with Johna. The IP address specified in the connection data field might be an internal, unrouteable address, which could cause problems. That makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
8 months ago
Okay, so we know that NAT can cause some issues with the IP addresses and ports used in the SDP. I'm leaning towards option C as the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
8 months ago
Hmm, this question is tricky. I'm not entirely sure about the complications that NAT can introduce in SDP for a SIP call. Let me think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77