Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 300-820 Topic 25 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-820 exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 25
[All 300-820 Questions]

D18912E1457D5D1DDCBD40AB3BF70D5D

Refer to the exhibit showing logs from the Expressway-C, a copy of the Expressway-E certificate, and the UC traversal zone configuration for the Expressway-C. An office administrator is deploying mobile and remote access and sees an issue with the UC traversal zone. The zone is showing ''TLS negotiation failure''. What is causing this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hubert
24 days ago
This question is like a game of Sudoku - you've got to put all the pieces together to get the right answer. I'm going to try to work through it step by step.
upvoted 0 times
Brunilda
16 days ago
A) The Expressway-E certificate includes the Expressway-C FQDN as a SAN entry
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Craig
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. The Expressway-C is missing the FQDN of the Cisco UCM in its certificate, and that's probably causing the problem. But I'm not totally sure.
upvoted 0 times
Veronika
9 days ago
C) In the UC Traversal Zone on the Expressway-C, the peer address is set to the IP of the Expressway-E, which is not a SAN entry in the Expressway-E certificate
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
23 days ago
B) The Expressway-C is missing the FQDN of Cisco UCM in the Common Name of its certificate
upvoted 0 times
...
Daisy
25 days ago
A) The Expressway-E certificate includes the Expressway-C FQDN as a SAN entry
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candida
1 months ago
I agree, the Expressway-E certificate might be missing the FQDN of Cisco UCM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
1 months ago
This question is a real head-scratcher. I'm going to have to think about it for a while. Hopefully, I can figure it out before the exam!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
1 months ago
I think the issue is with the Expressway-E certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
1 months ago
D seems like the most likely answer to me. The Expressway-E certificate is missing the FQDN of the Cisco UCM, and that's causing the TLS negotiation failure.
upvoted 0 times
Carmelina
7 days ago
D) The Expressway-E does not have the FQDN of Cisco UCM listed as a SAN in its certificate
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
10 days ago
C) In the UC Traversal Zone on the Expressway-C, the peer address is set to the IP of the Expressway-E, which is not a SAN entry in the Expressway-E certificate
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
12 days ago
B) The Expressway-C is missing the FQDN of Cisco UCM in the Common Name of its certificate
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlee
14 days ago
We should update the certificate to include the necessary information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
17 days ago
I agree. The TLS negotiation failure is likely due to that mismatch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
1 months ago
That makes sense. It's important for the certificates to match.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
1 months ago
A) The Expressway-E certificate includes the Expressway-C FQDN as a SAN entry
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
1 months ago
D is correct. The Expressway-E certificate needs the FQDN of Cisco UCM.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vanna
2 months ago
I think the answer is C. The peer address in the UC Traversal Zone on the Expressway-C is set to the IP of the Expressway-E, but that's not a SAN entry in the Expressway-E certificate. That's got to be the issue.
upvoted 0 times
Rocco
23 days ago
C) In the UC Traversal Zone on the Expressway-C, the peer address is set to the IP of the Expressway-E, which is not a SAN entry in the Expressway-E certificate
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
26 days ago
B) The Expressway-C is missing the FQDN of Cisco UCM in the Common Name of its certificate
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
28 days ago
A) The Expressway-E certificate includes the Expressway-C FQDN as a SAN entry
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77