I think that one's just a red herring. They're probably trying to trip us up with that one. Nice try, test writers, but we chaos engineers are too smart for that!
Hmm, I don't know. Proactive testing sounds risky to me. Wouldn't it be better to just focus on reactive monitoring and preventing mistakes that could cause disruptions? Maybe option C is the way to go?
Haha, yeah, that's the idea! It's like Murphy's Law - whatever can go wrong, will go wrong. Might as well be the ones to make it happen, right? I'm definitely leaning towards B on this one.
Absolutely. B is the textbook chaos engineering principle. Though I have to say, 'common user access on system monitoring infrastructure' is a new one to me. Is that some kind of next-level chaos engineering I'm not aware of?
You know it, my friend! I think option B is the way to go. Chaos engineering is all about purposefully injecting failures into your system to see how it responds. That way, you can identify and fix any weak points before they become a problem.
Haha, yeah, C is a nice thought but a bit too idealistic. Chaos engineering is all about embracing the fact that mistakes and disruptions are inevitable, and figuring out how to deal with them.
Haha, yeah, C is a nice thought but a bit too idealistic. Chaos engineering is all about embracing the fact that mistakes and disruptions are inevitable, and figuring out how to deal with them.
Whoa, this question is a real brain-teaser! I'm not too familiar with chaos engineering, but I'm guessing it's all about proactively testing your system's resilience, yeah?
Yeah, B is the clear winner here. Though I do like the idea of 'prevent mistakes that cause infrastructure service disruption' - that's kind of the end goal of chaos engineering, isn't it?
I agree, B is the way to go. Chaos engineering is about being proactive and stress-testing your systems, not just reacting to issues. The whole point is to find weaknesses before they become real problems.
This is a pretty straightforward chaos engineering question. I think the correct answer is B - proactive testing based on system responsiveness. Chaos engineering is all about deliberately introducing failures and disruptions to see how your system reacts, not just waiting for something to go wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Shaun
6 months agoMargart
6 months agoAlberto
6 months agoShaun
6 months agoBrice
6 months agoStanton
6 months agoStevie
7 months agoBrice
7 months agoJess
8 months agoCaitlin
8 months agoMari
8 months agoArmanda
7 months agoClarinda
7 months agoMeghan
8 months agoEden
8 months agoJoni
8 months agoSharen
8 months agoMerissa
8 months agoGerald
8 months agoMargurite
8 months agoRosendo
8 months agoAja
8 months agoJenifer
8 months agoEdmond
8 months agoErick
8 months ago