New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-501 Topic 3 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-501 exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 3
[All 350-501 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

The CE router is peering with both PE routers and advertising a public prefix to the internet. Routing to and from this prefix will be asymmetric under certain network conditions, but packets must not be discarded. Which configuration must an engineer apply to the two PE routers so that they validate reverse packet forwarding for packets entering their Gi2 interfaces and drop traffic from the RFC1918 space?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ahmed
8 months ago
You know, I'm starting to think this is one of those questions where the exam writers are just trying to trip us up. They probably want us to know the specific command for validating reverse packet forwarding, but they're throwing in a bunch of other stuff to make it more complicated. I'm going to have to really dig into the details on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
8 months ago
Alright, let's think this through. Option A seems to be the closest, but it's allowing default traffic, which might not be what we want. Option B is targeting the specific interface, but I'm not sure if that's enough. Option C is trying to cover both requirements, but the ordering of the commands might be off. And option D is just plain confusing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
8 months ago
Hmm, this one's got me stumped. I can see the logic behind a few of the options, but I'm not confident that any of them are the right answer. I might need to review some of the routing concepts related to asymmetric routing and reverse packet forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
8 months ago
This question seems pretty tricky. The key seems to be ensuring that the packets entering the PE routers' Gi2 interfaces are validated for reverse packet forwarding, while also dropping traffic from the RFC1918 space. I'm not sure which option is the best, but I'll give it a shot.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77