Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-601 Topic 5 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-601 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 5
[All 350-601 Questions]

An engineer is implementing VSANs on a Cisco MDS 9000 Series Switch with a native Fibre Channel. The deployment must meet these requirements:

* The host on port fc1/1 must be assigned to VSAN 10.

* The port channel 10 ISL must pass multiple VSANs, including VSAN 10.

Which configuration set meets these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Maryann
2 months ago
Option B all the way! It's the most straightforward and follows the requirements to a T. Plus, who doesn't love a good VSAN database?
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
2 months ago
Option C seems a bit convoluted. Configuring the VSAN in the interface and then attaching it to the VSAN database? Come on, keep it simple!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
2 months ago
Haha, option D is definitely a trap. Disabling VSAN 1 and allowing VSAN 10 in the FLOGI database? That's just weird.
upvoted 0 times
Izetta
1 months ago
User 3: Option B looks like the correct configuration set for the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
1 months ago
Yeah, it doesn't make sense to disable VSAN 1 and allow VSAN 10 in the FLOGI database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
2 months ago
I agree, option D seems like a trap.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
German
2 months ago
I don't know, option A looks good too. Activating the VSAN on the virtual Fibre Channel interface and setting the encapsulation to EISL on the switch port could also work.
upvoted 0 times
Gwenn
1 months ago
Option A does seem like a solid configuration. Setting encapsulation EISL on the switch port is crucial for passing multiple VSANs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
1 months ago
I see your point. Option A does have some valid steps to meet the requirements. It's a tough decision between A and B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Associating VSAN 10 to interface vfc 1/1 and enabling vsan F-port-channel-trunk on the ISL should meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
2 months ago
Option A could work as well. Activating VSAN 10 in the vFC interface and associating it to interface vfc 1/1 might be a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
2 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most appropriate configuration. Binding VSAN 10 to interface fc1/1 in the VSAN database is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. Activating VSAN 10 on the vFC interface seems like the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
2 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. Creating VSAN 10 in the VSAN database and enabling VSAN trunking on the ISL should meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mike
2 months ago
Because activating VSAN 10 in the vFC interface and associating it to interface vfc 1/1 seems to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
3 months ago
Why do you think option A is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
3 months ago
Option B seems to be the correct answer. Creating the VSAN, binding it to the interface, and enabling VSAN trunking on the ISL with VSAN 10 allowed should meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Jovita
2 months ago
Agreed, creating the VSAN, binding it to the interface, and enabling VSAN trunking on the ISL with VSAN 10 allowed seems to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
2 months ago
I think option B is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adela
3 months ago
I think the correct configuration is option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77