Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-701 Topic 4 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-701 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 4
[All 350-701 Questions]

An organization wants to reduce their attach surface for cloud applications. They want to understand application communications, detect abnormal application Behavior, and detect vulnerabilities within the applications. Which action accomplishes this task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Reynalda
3 months ago
I still think A is the best choice, Secure Workload seems more focused on detecting vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
3 months ago
Yes, that could work too. It's important to have visibility and control over application access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
4 months ago
But isn't using Cisco ISE to provide application visibility and restrict access also a valid option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
4 months ago
That makes sense, Secure Workload is designed to help reduce attack surface for cloud applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
4 months ago
I think the answer is A) Configure Cisco Secure Workload to detect anomalies and vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
4 months ago
But wouldn't modifying the Cisco Duo configuration also restrict access between applications? Maybe D) is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
5 months ago
I think C) Implementing Cisco Umbrella to control access to applications makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) Use Cisco ISE to provide application visibility and restrict access to them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
5 months ago
I think the answer is A) Configure Cisco Secure Workload to detect anomalies and vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
6 months ago
You make a good point, but I think Cisco Secure Workload is the most comprehensive solution here. It's designed specifically for cloud environments, and the question is asking about reducing the attack surface for cloud apps. That's a pretty clear indication that A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernestine
6 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. Option B with Cisco ISE also sounds like it could be a valid solution, as it provides application visibility and access control. And Cisco Umbrella in option C could be used to control access to cloud applications as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
6 months ago
I agree, and based on the options provided, it looks like option A, configuring Cisco Secure Workload, is the best answer. It specifically mentions detecting anomalies and vulnerabilities, which are exactly what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
6 months ago
Hmm, this question seems to be testing our knowledge of Cisco security solutions. The key seems to be reducing the attack surface for cloud applications, which means we need a solution that can provide visibility, detect anomalies, and identify vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
Armanda
5 months ago
Option D doesn't seem to address the key points of reducing the attack surface for cloud applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
5 months ago
D) Modify the Cisco Duo configuration to restrict access between applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
5 months ago
I think option C could also be a good choice as it mentions controlling access to applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
5 months ago
C) Implement Cisco Umbrella to control the access each application is granted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
5 months ago
Hmm, I think option A makes sense since it specifically mentions detecting anomalies and vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
5 months ago
B) Use Cisco ISE to provide application visibility and restrict access to them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
5 months ago
A) Configure Cisco Secure Workload to detect anomalies and vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77