Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-901 Topic 13 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-901 exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 13
[All 350-901 Questions]

A developer is designing a modem, distributed microservice enterprise application. The application will be integrating with other systems and focus on a large deployment, so control of API calls is necessary. What is the best practice to reduce application response latency and protect the application from excessive use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ludivina
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of rate limiting. Option B is the way to go, my friends. Gotta protect that server and those clients from each other. Wouldn't want the whole system to go down in a blaze of glory, now would we?
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
2 months ago
I'm gonna have to go with Option B. Gotta keep those API calls in check on both ends, you know? Can't have the server getting overwhelmed and the client just going wild. Balance is key, people!
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 months ago
Option C? Are you kidding me? No rate limiting? That's like leaving the front door wide open and expecting no one to walk in. Definitely gotta go with Option B for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
2 months ago
Option B is the way to do it. Gotta protect that API from being overloaded, am I right? Can't have the whole system crashing down because someone went a little trigger-happy with the requests.
upvoted 0 times
Madalyn
1 months ago
Yolando: Absolutely, we need to ensure the application can handle the load and maintain performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
1 months ago
User 3: It's important to control the flow of requests to prevent excessive use and reduce latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, implementing rate limiting on both client and server sides is crucial for protecting the API.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
2 months ago
User 1: Option B is definitely the way to go. Can't risk the system getting overloaded.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
2 months ago
I think Option D is the best choice. Server-side rate limiting is the way to go - let the backend handle that heavy lifting. Keep those clients on a tight leash!
upvoted 0 times
Viva
22 days ago
I believe enforcing rate limiting on the server side is the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
26 days ago
I think implementing rate limiting on both the client and server sides would provide the best protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
27 days ago
I agree, server-side rate limiting is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carli
1 months ago
Implementing rate limiting on the server side is the best practice for controlling API calls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 months ago
I agree, server-side rate limiting is more secure and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
2 months ago
Option D is definitely the way to go. Let the server handle the rate limiting.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delsie
3 months ago
I think not enforcing any rate limiting can lead to potential issues with application performance and security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
3 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Implementing rate limiting on both client and server sides ensures a robust and scalable solution. Gotta keep those API calls in check, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Catina
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, having rate limiting on both client and server sides is crucial for managing API calls efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
2 months ago
User 1: Option B is definitely the best choice. It's important to have control on both ends.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bette
3 months ago
I agree with Rusty, having rate limiting on both sides provides a more robust protection against excessive use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe implementing rate limiting on both client and server sides is more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
4 months ago
I think implementing rate limiting on the client side is the best practice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77