Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-901 Topic 3 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-901 exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 3
[All 350-901 Questions]

A developer is designing a modem, distributed microservice enterprise application. The application will be integrating with other systems and focus on a large deployment, so control of API calls is necessary. What is the best practice to reduce application response latency and protect the application from excessive use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hoa
6 months ago
I think it's better to have control at both ends to ensure optimal performance and security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
6 months ago
But wouldn't implementing rate limiting on just the server side be enough to protect the application?
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
7 months ago
I agree, it helps control the flow of API calls and reduces the risk of excessive use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
7 months ago
I think implementing rate limiting on both client and server sides is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
8 months ago
That could be a good idea as well, to have double protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
8 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to have rate limiting on both the client and server sides?
upvoted 0 times
Kenny
8 months ago
D) Implement rate limiting on the server side.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
8 months ago
B) Implement rate limiting on the client and server sides.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
8 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to have rate limiting on both the client and server sides?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
8 months ago
B) Implement rate limiting on the client and server sides.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
8 months ago
A) Implement rate limiting on the client side.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laticia
8 months ago
I think the best practice would be to implement rate limiting on the server side.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77