Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-901 Topic 5 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-901 exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 5
[All 350-901 Questions]

A web application has those requirements for HTTP cache control:

The client browser must be prevented from storing responses that contain sensitive information.

Assets must be downloaded from the remote server every time.

Which header must the engineer use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Raina
2 months ago
I'm with the no-store gang! Wouldn't want any sensitive data floating around in the browser's cache. Solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
Reed
27 days ago
Caprice: Absolutely, better safe than sorry when it comes to protecting sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
1 months ago
Definitely, it's important to prioritize security when it comes to cache control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
1 months ago
I agree, no-store is the way to go to prevent sensitive data from being stored.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
2 months ago
Leonor: Absolutely, better safe than sorry when it comes to protecting sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
2 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it's important to prioritize security when it comes to cache control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, no-store is the way to go to prevent sensitive data from being stored.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deeanna
3 months ago
No-store is the clear winner here. Gotta keep those sensitive responses away from the browser cache, no exceptions!
upvoted 0 times
Lauryn
2 months ago
B: Definitely, we need to make sure those assets are downloaded from the server every time to ensure security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
2 months ago
A: I agree, no-store is the way to go to prevent storing sensitive information in the browser cache.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gene
3 months ago
Haha, must-revabdate? That's a new one! I'm going with no-store, keeps things secure and simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
3 months ago
Hmm, I was thinking about using private, but no-store makes more sense here. The question is pretty straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
3 months ago
I believe 'private' could also be a good option to prevent caching of sensitive data on the client side.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
3 months ago
Option B is the way to go! No-store is the header to use to prevent the browser from caching sensitive responses. Simple and effective!
upvoted 0 times
Dulce
2 months ago
Actually, public would allow the browser to cache the response, so it's not the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
2 months ago
C) public
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
2 months ago
That's right! Using no-store will prevent the browser from caching sensitive responses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
2 months ago
B) no-store
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helga
3 months ago
I agree with Holley, 'no-store' is the best option to ensure sensitive information is not stored.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
3 months ago
I think the engineer should use the 'no-store' header to prevent storing sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77