Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 350-901 Topic 7 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-901 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 7
[All 350-901 Questions]

A web application has those requirements for HTTP cache control:

The client browser must be prevented from storing responses that contain sensitive information.

Assets must be downloaded from the remote server every time.

Which header must the engineer use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Louvenia
2 months ago
Private? That's the one for the eyes-only stuff, isn't it? Nah, no-store is the winner here, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
Joni
13 days ago
Yeah, no-store is the header that will prevent the client browser from storing responses with sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
23 days ago
I think no-store is the right choice to ensure assets are downloaded every time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
26 days ago
I agree, no-store is the best option to prevent storing sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
28 days ago
No-store is definitely the way to go. Can't risk sensitive info being stored.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmen
2 months ago
Hmm, no-store sounds like the way to go. I wonder if the engineer will remember to bring a sign that says 'No Caching Allowed' to the server room. Just in case.
upvoted 0 times
Georgene
22 days ago
I agree, it's important to make sure the browser doesn't store any sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daisy
23 days ago
I think 'no-store' is the right choice to prevent caching sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
25 days ago
D) private
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
26 days ago
C) public
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
27 days ago
B) no-store
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
29 days ago
A) must-revalidate
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felix
2 months ago
'private' might work too, but 'no-store' is more explicit in preventing caching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
2 months ago
Public? Really? That's just asking for trouble, isn't it? I'm sticking with no-store.
upvoted 0 times
Flo
2 months ago
Yeah, public could lead to security issues. No-store is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
2 months ago
I think no-store is the best choice to prevent sensitive information from being stored.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
2 months ago
I agree, public is definitely risky. No-store is the safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
2 months ago
I wouldn't risk it with public either. No-store is the best choice for preventing sensitive information from being stored.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
2 months ago
Yeah, public sounds like it could lead to security issues. No-store is a safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
2 months ago
I agree, public is definitely risky. No-store is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wenona
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think 'private' could also work to prevent caching sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
3 months ago
I agree with Felix, 'no-store' is the best option to ensure security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
3 months ago
I think the engineer should use 'no-store' to prevent storing sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
3 months ago
Definitely go with no-store, that's the one that prevents caching of sensitive info, right?
upvoted 0 times
Miesha
2 months ago
I agree, no-store is the best option to prevent the client browser from storing responses with sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tesha
2 months ago
Yes, you're correct. no-store is the header that prevents caching of sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77