Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 400-007 Topic 3 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 400-007 exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 3
[All 400-007 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

After a network audit a network engineer must optimize the current network convergence time The proposed solution must consider link layer and control plane failures. Which solution meets the requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Francoise
4 months ago
Candidate 6: Yeah, it's important to consider both options and choose the one that best fits the network's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
4 months ago
Candidate 5: I think both C) Implement BFD and D) Enable LSP fast flood could work, depending on the specific network requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
5 months ago
Candidate 4: LSP fast flood could be a good choice too, it helps in quickly propagating link state information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
5 months ago
Candidate 3: I'm not sure about BFD, maybe D) Enable LSP fast flood could also work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
5 months ago
Candidate 2: I agree with that, BFD is definitely a good choice for optimizing network convergence time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
5 months ago
Candidate 1: I think the answer is C) Implement BFD because it helps in fast detection of failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
6 months ago
Yeah, BFD sounds like the way to go. Plus, it's vendor-agnostic, so it should work in a variety of network environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards C - Implement BFD. It's designed to quickly detect and notify routing protocols of failures, which should help with convergence.
upvoted 0 times
Lindsay
5 months ago
Great, let's go with C) Implement BFD as the solution for optimizing network convergence time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
5 months ago
Definitely, BFD would address both link layer and control plane failures for quicker detection and notification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
5 months ago
Makes sense, so C) Implement BFD is likely the most efficient solution for optimizing network convergence time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
5 months ago
Debounce timers may help with filtering out duplicate link state advertisements, but BFD would still be more effective for faster detection of failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
5 months ago
Would implementing debounce timers also help in this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
5 months ago
I agree, BFD is specifically designed to quickly detect failures and notify routing protocols.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
5 months ago
C) Implement BFD sounds like the best option to improve network convergence time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pamella
6 months ago
Alright, let's lock in C - Implement BFD. Now, who's ready to ace this exam and get that certification? I call dibs on the corner office!
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
6 months ago
Hah, this question is a real brain-teaser! I'm not sure I can keep up with all the networking jargon they're throwing at us.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77