Cisco Exam 400-007 Topic 4 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 400-007 exam

Question #: 50
Topic #: 4

[All 400-007 Questions]

Which statement about hot-potato routing architecture design is true?

AHot-potato routing is the preferred architecture when connecting to content providers

BHop-potato keeps traffic under the control of the network administrator for longer

COSPF uses hot-potato routing if all ASBRs use the same value for the external metric

DHot-potato routing is prone to misconfiguration as well as poor coordination between two networks

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Teddy at Sep 17, 2024, 02:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 400-007 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Leonida

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think B) Hot-potato keeps traffic under the control of the network administrator for longer makes sense too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dewitt

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Hot-potato routing is prone to misconfiguration as well as poor coordination between two networks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gwen

2 months ago

Ah, the classic hot-potato dilemma. I bet this question is going to make everyone in the exam hall hungry.

upvoted 0 times

...

France

2 months ago

Option A is tempting, but I don't think hot-potato is the preferred architecture for content providers. D seems more accurate.

upvoted 0 times

Isadora

25 days ago

So, D is the correct statement about hot-potato routing architecture design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jovita

1 months ago

It's true that hot-potato routing is prone to poor coordination between networks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucina

1 months ago

Yeah, hot-potato routing can lead to misconfiguration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlene

2 months ago

I think D is more accurate.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geoffrey

3 months ago

Hot-potato routing keeps traffic within the network longer, so I'd go with option B.

upvoted 0 times

Carlee

2 months ago

True, it's a trade-off between control and potential issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brendan

2 months ago

But hot-potato routing can lead to misconfiguration and poor coordination between networks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

2 months ago

I think hot-potato routing is the way to go, it keeps traffic under control.

upvoted 0 times

...

Milly

3 months ago

Option C sounds right to me. OSPF's use of hot-potato routing makes sense in that scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruthann

3 months ago

I think option D is correct. Hot-potato routing can be tricky to manage, especially when coordinating with other networks.

upvoted 0 times

Claribel

2 months ago

It's interesting to hear different perspectives on hot-potato routing. Each option has its own validity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zachary

2 months ago

I see your point, but I believe option C is the correct statement about hot-potato routing architecture design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Son

2 months ago

I think option A is also true, as hot-potato routing is often used when connecting to content providers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Golda

2 months ago

I agree, option D is definitely a challenge when it comes to hot-potato routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krissy

3 months ago

I think the answer is A) Hot-potato routing is the preferred architecture when connecting to content providers.

upvoted 0 times

...