Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 400-007 Topic 5 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 400-007 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 5
[All 400-007 Questions]

Two enterprise networks must be connected together. Both networks are using the same private IP addresses.

The client requests from both sides should be translated using hide NAT (dynamic NAT) with the overload

feature to save IF addresses from the NAT pools. Which design addresses this requirement using only one

Cisco I OS NAT router for both directions?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Vincenza at Sep 14, 2024, 09:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 400-007 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Brandon
2 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. It's important to carefully consider all the options before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
3 months ago
Hold up, are we sure we can't just use a magic wand and make the private IPs disappear? Or maybe a really big rubber band to stretch the IP addresses out of the way? Seriously, this is some serious networking ninja stuff right here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
3 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. If I'm reading this right, we need a single Cisco router to handle the NAT in both directions. I'm gonna go with option E, the NAT Virtual Interface, because that just sounds like the kind of wizardry Cisco would come up with.
upvoted 0 times
Bonita
1 months ago
Fingers crossed that the NAT Virtual Interface does the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
2 months ago
I think so too. Let's give it a try and see if it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
2 months ago
Option E sounds like a good choice. It's worth a shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devon
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the right choice as we need to use two different NAT pools for overload in both directions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
3 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer because we need to configure ip nat inside and ip nat outside with overload in both directions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
3 months ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of translating client requests when both networks are using the same private IPs. This is gonna be a real mind-bender, I can tell.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
3 months ago
Whoa, this is a tricky one! Dynamic NAT with overload, huh? I bet the key is all about those IP addresses and the magical Cisco IOS commands. Let's see if we can crack this!
upvoted 0 times
Darrin
2 months ago
C) The overload feature is the default and does not have to be configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
2 months ago
B) The ip nat inside and ip nat outside commands must be configured at the interfaces with the overload option in both directions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celia
3 months ago
A) This is not possible, because two Cisco IOS NAT routers are required to do dynamic NAT, with overload in both directions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77