Cisco Exam 400-007 Topic 6 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 400-007 exam

Question #: 53
Topic #: 6

Network changes because of mergers, acquisitions, and divestment can be very disruptive to the network if not carried out carefully. When an organization sells parts of its business, it must detach the affected parts of the network from the rest of the network. Which network design approach is appropriate to minimize the impact and risks as the divested parts of the network are detached?

Aredundant design

Bmodular design

Cless complex design

Drouted access design

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Hermila at Oct 18, 2024, 08:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 400-007 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Reed

18 days ago

Modular design is the way to go, no doubt about it. It's like having a set of Lego blocks - you can just snap the divested parts right off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reyes

20 days ago

Modular design, all the way. It's the network equivalent of a pre-nup - you never know when you might need to split up.

upvoted 0 times

Novella

10 days ago

B) modular design

upvoted 0 times

...

Bulah

12 days ago

A) redundant design

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

25 days ago

Less complex design? Seriously? That's like trying to fix a leaky faucet with duct tape. Modular design is the clear winner here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Regenia

28 days ago

I agree, modular design is the best option here. It gives you that flexibility to detach the divested parts without causing a massive headache.

upvoted 0 times

Tu

2 days ago

C) less complex design

upvoted 0 times

...

Elin

7 days ago

B) modular design

upvoted 0 times

...

Tora

19 days ago

A) redundant design

upvoted 0 times

...

Otis

1 months ago

I agree with Jimmie, modular design allows for easier detachment of network parts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Remona

1 months ago

Modular design is the way to go. It allows for easy separation of the affected parts without disrupting the entire network. Seems like the most logical approach to me.

upvoted 0 times