Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 400-007 Topic 8 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 400-007 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 8
[All 400-007 Questions]

Which option is a fate-sharing characteristic in regards to network design?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sheridan
2 months ago
While options B and C might be interesting, they don't seem to directly address the concept of fate-sharing. I'm sticking with A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers had a field day coming up with these options. Fate-sharing, really? Who comes up with these terms?
upvoted 0 times
Stephanie
19 days ago
C) It acts as a stateful forwarding device
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
20 days ago
B) It protects the network against failures in the distribution layer
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
1 months ago
A) A failure of a single element causes the entire service to fail
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Judy
2 months ago
Option D sounds like a good candidate too. Providing data sequencing and acknowledgment mechanisms is an important characteristic of fate-sharing.
upvoted 0 times
Dante
1 months ago
It helps ensure data is transmitted and received correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
1 months ago
Yes, providing data sequencing and acknowledgment mechanisms is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
2 months ago
Option D sounds like a good candidate too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iluminada
3 months ago
I believe option B is also a fate-sharing characteristic, as it protects against failures in the distribution layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
3 months ago
I agree with Marleen, because if one element fails, the whole service goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
3 months ago
I think option A is a fate-sharing characteristic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
3 months ago
I think option A is the correct answer. A failure of a single element causing the entire service to fail is a classic example of fate-sharing in network design.
upvoted 0 times
Fausto
2 months ago
Yes, that's right. It's important to consider fate-sharing when designing a network to ensure reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pauline
3 months ago
I agree, option A is the correct answer. Fate-sharing is all about one failure affecting the entire service.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77