Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 400-007 Topic 9 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 400-007 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 9
[All 400-007 Questions]

Network changes because of mergers, acquisitions, and divestment can be very disruptive to the network if not carried out carefully. When an organization sells parts of its business, it must detach the affected parts of the network from the rest of the network. Which network design approach is appropriate to minimize the impact and risks as the divested parts of the network are detached?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Princess
6 months ago
Haha, I bet the examiners are having a field day with this one. 'Less complex design' - really? As if that's ever the answer for anything network-related!
upvoted 0 times
Mirta
5 months ago
C) less complex design
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
5 months ago
B) modular design
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
5 months ago
A) redundant design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fabiola
6 months ago
I agree with Gwenn, modular design allows for easier detachment of network components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
6 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think a modular design approach is the best option. It gives you the flexibility to detach the affected parts without causing too much chaos.
upvoted 0 times
Frank
6 months ago
Less complex design might be a good option to simplify the detachment process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
6 months ago
Redundant design could also work to minimize impact and risks during network changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
6 months ago
I agree, a modular design approach allows for easier detachment of network parts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gwenn
6 months ago
I think modular design would be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
7 months ago
Modular design is the way to go here. It allows for easy separation of the divested parts without disrupting the rest of the network.
upvoted 0 times
Deonna
5 months ago
B) modular design
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
5 months ago
A) redundant design
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
5 months ago
B) modular design
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
6 months ago
A) redundant design
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
6 months ago
I agree, modular design is definitely the best approach in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
6 months ago
Modular design allows for easy separation of the divested parts without disrupting the rest of the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77