Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 500-220 Topic 1 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-220 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 1
[All 500-220 Questions]

What is out of scope when considering the Best practices for high-density wireless designs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

https://documentation.meraki.com/Architectures_and_Best_Practices/Cisco_Meraki_Best_Practice_Design/Best_Practice_Design_-_MR_Wireless/High_Density_Wi-Fi_Deployments


by Myra at Mar 20, 2024, 12:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-220 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rosio
3 months ago
I think band selection is out of scope. It's more about optimizing the radio frequency environment, not the actual design principles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
3 months ago
That makes sense, Keva. High-density designs are more about handling large volumes of devices, not speed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
4 months ago
Actually, I believe minimum bitrate is out of scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
4 months ago
I agree with Cristy, number of SSIDs is not relevant to high-density wireless designs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
4 months ago
I think out of scope is the number of SSIDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
4 months ago
I think A) maximum beamforming is out of scope because it's more related to signal optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
5 months ago
I agree with Edda. The number of SSIDs can affect performance in high-density environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
5 months ago
I disagree. I believe it's C) minimum bitrate because it's important for high-density designs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
5 months ago
I think the answer is D) number of SSIDs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
6 months ago
You make a good point. Minimum bitrate doesn't really seem like it would be a best practice for high-density design. That's more of a consideration for specific client requirements, I'd say.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
6 months ago
Yeah, definitely. But minimum bitrate? I'm not so sure about that one. Isn't the goal to maximize throughput and coverage in a high-density environment?
upvoted 0 times
Krystal
5 months ago
Yeah, maximizing beamforming can really improve overall coverage
upvoted 0 times
...
Kara
5 months ago
Band selection is crucial for optimal performance
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
5 months ago
I think minimum bitrate is still important to consider
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
5 months ago
D) number of SSIDs
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
5 months ago
C) minimum bitrate
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
5 months ago
B) band selection
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
5 months ago
A) maximum beamforming
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Verlene
6 months ago
Exactly! So that leaves us with A, B, and D as potential answers. I'm leaning towards C being the correct one, since minimum bitrate doesn't really fit the scope of high-density wireless design principles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
6 months ago
Alright, I think we've got it figured out. C is the answer - minimum bitrate is out of scope when considering best practices for high-density wireless designs. Nice work, team!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77