Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 500-220 Topic 1 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-220 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 1
[All 500-220 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Why does the end user complain of poor wireless performance?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alona
2 months ago
I'm going with option C. The client is clearly trying to use the secondary radio instead of the primary one. Rookie mistake.
upvoted 0 times
Clement
1 months ago
User3: I agree with User2, option C makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
1 months ago
User2: No way, it's definitely option C. The client should be connected to the primary radio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
2 months ago
User1: I think option A is the reason for poor wireless performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nadine
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the user is just holding the device wrong. That's always a classic wireless troubleshooting technique!
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
2 months ago
The client using a 20 MHz channel width seems like the obvious answer to me. That's going to severely limit the available bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
Felton
1 months ago
Maybe the client being connected to the secondary radio instead of the primary radio is causing issues too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
1 months ago
Channel 48 utilization being at 84 percent is a red flag for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
1 months ago
I think the non-802.11 traffic of 18 percent could also be a contributing factor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
1 months ago
The client using a 20 MHz channel width is definitely a problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marilynn
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. The non-802.11 traffic of 18% also sounds like a potential issue with AP placement. Maybe the AP is in a suboptimal location.
upvoted 0 times
Rima
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, but the non-802.11 traffic of 18% could also be a problem with AP placement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
2 months ago
User 1: I think the end user is using a 20 MHz channel width to connect.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesusita
3 months ago
That's a good point, Irma. Using the secondary radio instead of the primary can impact performance. It's important to check that as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
3 months ago
I believe the end user might also be experiencing poor performance because they are connected to the secondary radio instead of the primary radio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
3 months ago
The high channel utilization on Channel 48 is definitely the culprit here. 84% is way too high for good wireless performance.
upvoted 0 times
Tricia
2 months ago
C) The client is connected to the secondary radio of the AP instead of the primary radio
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
2 months ago
A) Channel 48 utilization is at 84 percent.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kasandra
3 months ago
I agree with you, Vanna. High channel utilization can definitely lead to poor performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
3 months ago
I think the end user is complaining about poor wireless performance because of the high channel utilization on Channel 48.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77