Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 500-220 Topic 1 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-220 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 1
[All 500-220 Questions]

Which information do the MXs in a High Availability pair share?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

DHCP Synchronization To prevent a scenario in which an IP address is assigned by the primary via DHCP and then that same address is assigned to another client by the secondary after a failover, the DHCP lease table is synchronized regularly between the primary and secondary over UDP port 3483. https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Deployment_Guides/MX_Warm_Spare_-_High_Availability_Pair


by Laurel at Sep 19, 2024, 01:55 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-220 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jeannetta
2 months ago
Gotta be C. The DHCP association database is the heart of the network, and if that's not shared, good luck keeping your devices connected!
upvoted 0 times
Sunshine
1 months ago
C) DHCP association database
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
1 months ago
B) time synchronization state
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
1 months ago
A) spanning-tree state
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
D is the way to go. What's the point of high availability if your firewall isn't seamlessly failover-ing? Although, I do wonder if they share my mom's recipe for apple pie as well.
upvoted 0 times
Derick
26 days ago
Haha, I don't think they share apple pie recipes, but that would be interesting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
28 days ago
I agree, having a seamless failover for the firewall is crucial in high availability setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
1 months ago
D) stateful firewall database
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
1 months ago
C) DHCP association database
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
1 months ago
B) time synchronization state
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
1 months ago
A) spanning-tree state
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mayra
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards B. Time synchronization is crucial for keeping everything in sync, right? Wouldn't want my firewall to be off by a few seconds!
upvoted 0 times
Whitney
1 months ago
User1: It's settled then, B it is for the information the MXs share in a High Availability pair.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
1 months ago
User3: I agree, having the MXs share time synchronization state is crucial for High Availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
1 months ago
Yeah, time synchronization is definitely important for maintaining accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
1 months ago
I think you're right, B sounds like the best option for keeping everything in sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
2 months ago
Agreed, having the MXs share time synchronization state is crucial for High Availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
2 months ago
Yeah, time synchronization is definitely important for maintaining accuracy in the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
2 months ago
I think you're right, B sounds like the best option for keeping everything in sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Andree
3 months ago
I believe they also share the stateful firewall database to ensure consistent security policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
3 months ago
I agree with Alex, having synchronized time is crucial for failover to work properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
3 months ago
I'm pretty sure the MXs share the stateful firewall database, option D. That's like the core of high availability!
upvoted 0 times
Julio
2 months ago
Definitely, it's a key component for network reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
2 months ago
It helps ensure seamless failover in case of any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
2 months ago
Yeah, that's crucial for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chara
3 months ago
I think you're right, the MXs share the stateful firewall database.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alex
3 months ago
I think the MXs in a High Availability pair share time synchronization state.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77