Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 500-220 Topic 4 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-220 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 4
[All 500-220 Questions]

A Cisco Meraki MX security appliance is trying to route a packet to the destination IP address of 172.18.24.12. Which routes contained in its routing table does it select?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Route Priority

Each type of route configured on the MX has a specific priority in comparison with other types of routes. The priority is as follows:

Directly Connected

Client VPN

Static Routes

AutoVPN Routes

Non-Meraki VPN Peers

BGP learned Routes

NAT*

https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Networks_and_Routing/MX_Routing_Behavior


Contribute your Thoughts:

Franchesca
2 months ago
I'm betting on Option D. Gotta love those directly connected routes! They're like the superheroes of the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
Lizette
1 months ago
User2: Yeah, I agree. They're like the superheroes of the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
1 months ago
User3: Definitely, they make routing packets a breeze.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laine
1 months ago
I think Option D is the way to go. Directly connected routes are reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annamae
2 months ago
Option A? Really? The Auto VPN route? I think the Meraki appliance would be smart enough to avoid that. *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Rolland
25 days ago
User3: I'm not so sure, I think it might go for the non-Meraki VPN route instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
26 days ago
User2: Yeah, I agree. It seems like the most specific route for that destination IP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
1 months ago
I think the Meraki appliance would choose the directly connected route.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Therese
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the non-Meraki VPN route 172.18.24.0/24 could also be a valid option for the appliance to select.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
2 months ago
I agree with Marilynn, the directly connected route seems like the most specific match for the destination IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between Options B and D. 172.16.0.0/12 is a larger subnet, but 172.18.16.0/20 is more specific. I'll have to think this one through.
upvoted 0 times
Caitlin
1 months ago
You're right, I'll go with option D, the directly connected route 172.18.16.0/20. Thanks for the input!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
1 months ago
I see your point, but the more specific route in option D might be the better choice for this packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
2 months ago
But option B, the static route 172.16.0.0/12, covers a larger range. Maybe that's a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
2 months ago
I think you should go with option D, the directly connected route 172.18.16.0/20.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Armanda
3 months ago
I'm going with Option C. It's the most specific route that matches the destination IP address.
upvoted 0 times
Nobuko
1 months ago
I agree with Option C. It's important to choose the most specific route for routing packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
2 months ago
I would go with Option D. The directly connected route seems like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
2 months ago
I think Option C is the best choice too. It matches the destination IP address exactly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marilynn
3 months ago
I think the Cisco Meraki MX security appliance will select the directly connected route 172.18.16.0/20.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
3 months ago
Option D seems like the obvious choice here. The destination IP address is within the 172.18.16.0/20 subnet, so the directly connected route should be selected.
upvoted 0 times
Bernadine
2 months ago
Yes, the directly connected route is the most specific match for the destination IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
3 months ago
I agree, option D is the correct choice since the destination IP falls within that subnet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77