Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 500-230 Topic 1 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-230 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 1
[All 500-230 Questions]

Which statements are true regarding L3VPN configurations?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carlota
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's important to understand the reasoning behind each option to make an informed choice on the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
6 months ago
But doesn't the Route Distinguisher and Route Targets need to be the same on a single PE router, like option B) suggests?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
6 months ago
I believe the answer is C) because the neighbor in the VPNv4 address-family must already be configured for IPv4-Unicast.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
6 months ago
I disagree, I think the answer is D) because import and export Route Targets must be the same on a PE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
6 months ago
I think the answer is A) because you need to instantiate the VPNv4 address-family first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
6 months ago
I'm not sure about statement B, can someone explain why the Route Distinguisher and Route Targets must be the same on a single PE router?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
7 months ago
I agree with Sheridan, we need to have the VPNv4 address-family before configuring a vrf on the router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe statement D is true because the import and export Route Targets must match on a PE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
7 months ago
I think statement A is true because we need to instantiate the VPNv4 address-family before configuring a vrf.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
8 months ago
Yep, I think you've got it! Although, you know, sometimes these certification exams try to catch you with little gotchas like that. Better double-check our answers just to be sure. Wouldn't want to get tripped up by some sneaky wording or something.
upvoted 0 times
Desirae
7 months ago
A) Prior to configuring a vrf within MP-BGP, the router has to have instantiated the VPNv4 or VPNv6 address-family.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
8 months ago
Exactly, those little details can make all the difference in passing or failing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
8 months ago
B) On a single PE router, the Route Distinguisher and the Route Targets must be the same.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
8 months ago
Yeah, good point. Always important to double-check, especially with these tricky exams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
8 months ago
D) The import and export Route Targets must be the same on a PE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
8 months ago
C) Prior to configuring a neighbor in the VPNv4 address-family, it must already be configured for IPv4-Unicast.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
8 months ago
A) Prior to configuring a vrf within MP-BGP, the router has to have instantiated the VPNv4 or VPNv6 address-family.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fernanda
8 months ago
Haha, no kidding. These exams can be brutal. But hey, at least we're all in this together, right? I'll take one last look over the options, and then we can compare our final answers. Teamwork makes the dreamwork!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
8 months ago
Aha, good catch! I was a bit unsure about that one, but you're right. Alright, let me recap what we've got so far: A and C are true, B and D are false. Does that sound about right?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77