Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 500-285 Topic 1 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-285 exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 1
[All 500-285 Questions]

What does packet latency thresholding measure?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Galen
4 months ago
Yes, I agree. It's essential to understand how packet latency thresholding works for network performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
4 months ago
That makes sense too, it's important to consider all those factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
4 months ago
I think it could also be the amount of time it takes for a rule to process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
4 months ago
But isn't it more about the time span between a triggered event and when the packet is dropped?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe it measures the total elapsed time it takes to process a packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
4 months ago
I think packet latency thresholding measures the time it takes to process an event.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
5 months ago
I see your point, but I think it's actually about the amount of time it takes for a rule to process (B).
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
5 months ago
I think it's more about the time span between a triggered event and when the packet is dropped (D).
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe it measures the total elapsed time to process a packet (A).
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
5 months ago
I think packet latency thresholding measures the time it takes to process an event (C).
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
6 months ago
Haha, yeah, that's gotta be it. I mean, who cares about the total time to process a packet? That's not really a useful metric. Latency thresholding is all about that critical drop time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
6 months ago
Oh, I think I've got it! Packet latency thresholding is about the time span between when an event triggers and when the packet is actually dropped, right? That would make the most sense based on the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
6 months ago
I agree. It's also not about the time it takes for a specific rule to process, or the time to process an event. That's more about individual components, not the overall latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
6 months ago
Hmm, this question seems to be testing our understanding of network performance metrics. Packet latency thresholding is definitely not just about the total time it takes to process a packet. That's too broad.
upvoted 0 times
Jill
5 months ago
Definitely, it's more specific than that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
5 months ago
I agree, it's not just about the total time to process a packet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
5 months ago
Hmm, I think it measures the amount of time it takes for a rule to process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
5 months ago
D) the time span between a triggered event and when the packet is dropped
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
5 months ago
C) the amount of time it takes to process an event
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
5 months ago
B) the the amount of time it takes for a rule to process
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
5 months ago
A) the total elapsed time it takes to process a packet
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77