Haha, you all sound pretty confident, but I'm leaning more towards D - the host is not on a monitored network segment. If it's not being monitored, then how could it be evaluated for the whitelist?
You guys are close, but I think the answer is actually A - the host is not a target of the whitelist. If the host isn't on the whitelist, then it wouldn't be able to be evaluated, right?
I'm not too sure about that, Aja. I was thinking it might be C - the whitelist status could not be updated because the correlation policy it belongs to is not enabled. That would also make sense in terms of why the host is 'not evaluated'.
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I think the answer is probably B - the host could not be evaluated because no profile exists for it. That seems like the most logical explanation for the 'not evaluated' status.
Leota
8 months agoReed
8 months agoDante
8 months agoAja
8 months agoMarshall
8 months agoWilda
8 months agoJosefa
8 months agoLaurel
8 months agoAlecia
8 months agoDana
8 months ago