Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 500-301 Topic 1 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-301 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 1
[All 500-301 Questions]

Which option is the maximum capacity of a Cisco BE7000 appliance deployment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/business-edition-7000/data-sheet-c78-730649.html


by Chantell at Mar 19, 2024, 02:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-301 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Janae
3 months ago
C: I see. I thought it was 10000 because that seems like a reasonable capacity for such an appliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
3 months ago
B: I read somewhere that Cisco BE7000 doesn't have a specific limit on the number of users it can support.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
3 months ago
A: That's interesting. Why do you think it's no enforced limit?
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
3 months ago
C: I think it's 10000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
4 months ago
B: I believe it's no enforced limit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
4 months ago
A: What do you think is the maximum capacity of a Cisco BE7000 appliance deployment?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
4 months ago
I believe option A) no enforced limit is the best choice, to allow for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
4 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to have no enforced limit to not restrict future growth?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
5 months ago
I think option B) 10000 could be the maximum capacity, it seems like a reasonable number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
5 months ago
I agree with Shaun, it makes sense for there to be no enforced limit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
5 months ago
I think the maximum capacity should be no enforced limit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
6 months ago
Hey, has anyone else noticed that the options go from 'no enforced limit' all the way down to 1,000? That's quite a range!
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
6 months ago
Yeah, I think 5,000 is the way to go. It seems like the most reasonable capacity for a Cisco appliance of this type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
6 months ago
Alright, let's think this through logically. I'm pretty sure 'no enforced limit' is not a realistic option, so that leaves us with 10,000, 5,000, or 1,000. I'm going to go with 5,000 as my final answer.
upvoted 0 times
Sonia
5 months ago
I'm going with 5000 as well as my final answer
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
5 months ago
Option C) 5000
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
5 months ago
That's a huge number, could be a possibility
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
5 months ago
Option B) 10000
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
5 months ago
I think 'no enforced limit' is too unrealistic
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
5 months ago
Option A) no enforced limit
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delpha
6 months ago
Agreed. I'm feeling confident about 5,000 as the correct answer. Let's lock it in!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77