Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 500-325 Topic 1 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-325 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 1
[All 500-325 Questions]

Which description of the Virtual Machine Placement Tool is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Sabra at Mar 15, 2024, 03:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-325 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lelia
3 months ago
That's a good point, Viola. Mapping virtual servers to physical servers could be another function of the tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might also involve mapping virtual servers to physical servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
3 months ago
I agree with Lelia, it makes sense to have a tool for placing virtual servers in the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
4 months ago
I think the Virtual Machine Placement Tool is a way to place virtual servers in the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
4 months ago
Candidate 2: Candidate 1, can you explain why you think it's B in more detail?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
4 months ago
Candidate 5: I'm not sure, but I think C doesn't make sense in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
4 months ago
Candidate 4: I think it might be D, placing virtual servers on Spark could also be a valid use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
4 months ago
Candidate 3: I agree with Candidate 1, mapping virtual servers to physical servers is crucial for efficient resource allocation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
5 months ago
Candidate 2: No, I believe it's A, it's more about placing virtual servers in the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
5 months ago
Candidate 1: I think the answer is B, it's about mapping virtual servers to physical servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
6 months ago
Oh man, that mental image is great. Yeah, no way the Virtual Machine Placement Tool has anything to do with the cloud. It's all about optimizing the use of your physical server infrastructure. B is definitely the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
6 months ago
Haha, I almost went with the cloud answer just to mess with you guys. Can you imagine trying to use the Virtual Machine Placement Tool to manage VMs in the cloud? That would be a total disaster!
upvoted 0 times
...
An
6 months ago
I agree with you on that. The tool is designed to optimize the placement of virtual machines on physical hardware, so B is the right choice. I'm not sure why they would include answers about the cloud or Spark - those seem like completely different concepts.
upvoted 0 times
Vonda
5 months ago
It's important to understand the purpose of the tool before making a choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
5 months ago
I'm glad we're on the same page about this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
5 months ago
Definitely, B) way to map virtual servers to physical servers is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
5 months ago
Yeah, placing virtual servers in the cloud or on Spark is a different concept altogether.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
5 months ago
I agree, it's all about optimizing the placement of virtual machines on physical hardware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erin
5 months ago
I think the Virtual Machine Placement Tool is a way to map virtual servers to physical servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickole
6 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I can see some tricky aspects to it. The Virtual Machine Placement Tool is clearly about mapping virtual servers to physical servers, so I think B is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77