Cisco Exam 500-420 Topic 1 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-420 exam

Question #: 23
Topic #: 1

A Performance Analyst has enabled Development Level Monitoring for an application. For a default configuration, in which scenario will Development Level Monitoring get automatically disabled?

AA maximum of 500 calls per minute limit is exceeded, and Maximum heap utilization percentage goes above 90%

BA maximum of 1500 calls per minute limit is exceeded, and Maximum heap utilization percentage goes above 90%

CA maximum of 1000 calls per minute limit is exceeded, and Maximum heap utilization percentage goes above 95%

DA maximum of 2000 calls per minute limit is exceeded, and Maximum heap utilization percentage goes above 95%

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

Development Level Monitoring in AppDynamics is designed for use in a lower volume, non-production environment. For a default configuration, Development Level Monitoring will get automatically disabled if the monitored environment exceeds a threshold, typically a maximum of 1000 calls per minute, and the Maximum heap utilization percentage goes above 95%. These thresholds are in place to prevent excessive overhead in a production environment where such detailed monitoring could impact performance.

AppDynamics documentation on Agent Configuration: Provides information on configuration settings for monitoring levels, including when Development Level Monitoring is automatically disabled due to exceeding thresholds.

by Lisbeth at Sep 17, 2024, 08:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Erasmo

2 months ago

Haha, this question is a real brain-teaser! I'm guessing option A, just to be on the safe side. Gotta keep an eye on that heap utilization, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Belen

1 months ago

User1: Agreed, let's stick with option A and keep an eye on that heap utilization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Iraida

1 months ago

User2: Yeah, better safe than sorry. Let's go with option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

1 months ago

User 4: Let's go with option A then, better safe than sorry.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vince

2 months ago

I agree, option A seems like the safest choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandee

2 months ago

I think option A is the right choice too. Can't risk hitting that heap utilization limit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

2 months ago

Yeah, keeping an eye on heap utilization is important.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnee

2 months ago

I think option A is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nydia

2 months ago

But A makes more sense because the limit is lower and the heap utilization percentage is slightly lower as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nydia

2 months ago

I think the answer is A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delisa

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Armando

3 months ago

Hmm, I'm going to go with option B. 1500 calls per minute and 90% heap utilization seems like a more realistic scenario for when the monitoring would get disabled.

upvoted 0 times

Leigha

2 months ago

Agreed, option B seems like the most likely scenario for the monitoring to get disabled.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynda

2 months ago

Yeah, and 90% heap utilization is pretty high too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dell

2 months ago

I think option B makes sense. 1500 calls per minute is a lot.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmelina

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think option D is the right answer. 2000 calls per minute and 95% heap utilization seems like a high bar to hit before disabling the monitoring.

upvoted 0 times

Carlee

1 months ago

True, but I think the heap utilization percentage is more critical, so option C might be the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Haley

2 months ago

But what if the calls per minute exceed 1500? Option B covers that scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gabriele

2 months ago

I agree, option C seems more reasonable with 1000 calls per minute and 95% heap utilization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantell

3 months ago

I think option D is too high of a threshold for disabling the monitoring.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colton

3 months ago

Option C looks good to me. Exceeding 1000 calls per minute and 95% heap utilization seems like a reasonable trigger for disabling the development monitoring.

upvoted 0 times

Helga

2 months ago

Yeah, exceeding 1000 calls per minute and 95% heap utilization makes sense for disabling development monitoring.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebecka

3 months ago

I think option C is the correct one.

upvoted 0 times

...