Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 500-470 Topic 1 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-470 exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 1
[All 500-470 Questions]

What is the maximum # of concurrent endpoint with a distributed deployment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kate
4 months ago
I think the answer is 20,000 because that seems like a realistic number for a distributed deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
4 months ago
I remember reading that it's actually 500,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
4 months ago
I am leaning towards 100,000 as the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is 10,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
4 months ago
I think the answer is 20,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
4 months ago
I'm leaning towards 10,000 as the maximum number of concurrent endpoint. It just feels right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
4 months ago
I believe the answer is 20,000. That seems like a more practical number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
4 months ago
I agree with Beatriz. 100,000 sounds more reasonable for concurrent endpoint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
5 months ago
500,000 seems too high to me. I would go with 100,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisandra
5 months ago
I think the maximum # of concurrent endpoint is 500,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
6 months ago
I'm going to go with option B, 20,000. While 100,000 might be possible, I feel like that's pushing the limits a bit. 20,000 sounds more realistic and within the capabilities of a typical distributed deployment. But hey, what do I know? I'm just guessing here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
6 months ago
I think option D, 100,000, sounds the most reasonable. Distributed deployments are designed to handle large-scale workloads, so 100,000 concurrent endpoints doesn't seem too far-fetched. But I'm not 100% sure, to be honest.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
5 months ago
I think option A, 500,000, could be the maximum.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
5 months ago
Option B, 20,000, seems plausible to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
5 months ago
I also agree with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
5 months ago
I believe option A, 500,000, is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
5 months ago
I think option C, 10,000, might be more accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
5 months ago
I would go with option D as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glynda
6 months ago
Haha, yeah, Rahim's going big or going home, that's for sure. But hey, you never know, maybe he's secretly a distributed deployment genius. Or maybe he's just really good at guessing. Either way, I've got to give him props for his confidence!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
6 months ago
Whoa, 500,000? That's like having an entire city's population as your concurrent endpoints. I admire your optimism, Rahim, but I think you might be reaching a little too far there. Maybe we should all just take a deep breath and try to think this through logically.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77