Ah, but don't forget the potential design and deployment opportunities that come with SD-Access! Sure, the 'one switch' approach is safer, but we might be missing out on some really cool new features.
I'm with you guys on that. It's all about protecting the recent investments, you know? No need to scrap perfectly good hardware just to deploy the latest and greatest.
Definitely, the 'one switch at a time' method sounds like it would minimize the risk of disrupting the network. And being able to roll back easily is a huge plus, in case something goes wrong during the upgrade.
This 'one switch at a time' approach seems like a pretty sensible way to integrate SD-Access in an existing environment. It's got to be better than just ripping out everything all at once and hoping for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Floyd
8 months agoHershel
8 months agoAnnice
8 months agoJackie
8 months ago