Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 500-490 Topic 1 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-490 exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 1
[All 500-490 Questions]

Which are two advantages of a ''one switch at a time'' approach to integrating SD-Access into an existing brownfield environment? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jesusa
6 months ago
I agree with that. It also allows for simplified testing before fully implementing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
6 months ago
I also believe that it involves the least risk compared to other approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
6 months ago
Yes, that's one advantage. It allows for upgrading legacy hardware slowly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
6 months ago
I think the 'one switch at a time' approach is good for protecting recent investments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
7 months ago
I see the point. It's important to ensure a smooth transition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
7 months ago
I believe option F is also valuable. Testing before cutover can prevent major issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marla
7 months ago
I agree with you, Elenor. Upgrading without risking investments is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
7 months ago
I think option B is a good advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
8 months ago
I'm not so sure about E being an advantage. 'Many new design and deployment opportunities' sounds a bit too good to be true. I'd be more cautious about that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
8 months ago
Yeah, I'm leaning towards B and D as the correct answers here. Simplified testing and rollback are key advantages of the 'one switch at a time' approach. It's like the tortoise and the hare – slow and steady wins the race!
upvoted 0 times
Detra
8 months ago
For sure, can't go wrong with a cautious approach when it comes to upgrades.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
8 months ago
In this case, taking it slow and steady is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
8 months ago
Exactly, it's like a safety net that allows for a smoother transition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
8 months ago
I hear you, it's all about protecting investments and having a safety net.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
8 months ago
Definitely, with simplified testing and rollback, there's less risk involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
8 months ago
I agree, B and D make sense. Slow and steady wins the race for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Benton
8 months ago
I agree, the 'one switch at a time' approach seems like the least risky option. It allows for simplified testing and rollback if needed. Plus, it's suitable for both campus and remote sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
8 months ago
This question really tests our understanding of SD-Access integration. I think the 'one switch at a time' approach is the most practical option, especially for a brownfield environment where you want to protect recent investments.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77