Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 500-490 Topic 1 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-490 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 1
[All 500-490 Questions]

Which two statements are true regarding Cisco ISE? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sang
3 months ago
That's good to know, Domonique. It's important to consider storage for log retention in security systems like Cisco ISE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
3 months ago
I'm pretty confident that F is true. The number of logs that ISE retains is indeed determined by disk space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
3 months ago
I'm not sure about E, though. Can anyone confirm if ISE really supports up to 100 Policy Services Nodes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
3 months ago
I agree with you, Sang. I also believe D is true because ISE does support IPv6 downloadable ACLs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
3 months ago
I think A is true because I've read about automatic failover in Cisco ISE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
4 months ago
That's a good point Looks like there are more correct statements than we initially thought.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
4 months ago
I think D is also true. IPv6 downloadable ACLs are supported.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
4 months ago
Hmm, you might be right That does make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
5 months ago
I disagree. I believe B is true as well. ISE can detect endpoints with NAT translations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
5 months ago
I agree with In two-node standalone deployments, failover is definitely manual.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
5 months ago
I think only A and C are true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
6 months ago
Okay, let's think this through systematically. I'll start with option A and see if I can eliminate some of the choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
6 months ago
Haha, you guys are really overthinking this! Just remember, the question says 'choose two' - so it's not about getting every detail right, just the two most correct statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
6 months ago
Hmm, let's see. I'm pretty sure that in a two-node standalone deployment, failover has to be done manually. And I think the number of logs that ISE can retain is limited by the available disk space, not a fixed number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
6 months ago
Haha, I wonder if the exam writers threw in any 'gotcha' answers to see if we're paying attention. We'll have to stay on our toes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
6 months ago
Yeah, I'll go with those too. B and E seem a bit more uncertain, so I'll steer clear of those.
upvoted 0 times
Terrilyn
5 months ago
C) In two-node standalone ISE deployments, failover must be done manually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
5 months ago
A) In distributed deployments, failover from primary to secondary Policy Administration Nodes happens automatically.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlton
6 months ago
Haha, good point, David. Alright, let's go with A and F. Automatic failover and disk space-based log retention seem like the safest bets here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
6 months ago
Ugh, I hate questions like this. There's always some obscure detail that can trip you up. I hope I remember the right information.
upvoted 0 times
Lamar
4 months ago
F) The number of logs that ISE can retain is determined by your disk space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamar
5 months ago
B) ISE can detected endpoints whose addresses have been translated via NAT.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Levi
6 months ago
This question is a bit tricky, there are a few options that sound plausible. I'll have to really think this through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
6 months ago
Agreed, this is an important exam question. I've been studying the ISE documentation, so I'm feeling pretty confident about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
6 months ago
Hmm, this question seems to be testing our knowledge of Cisco ISE features and capabilities. I'm a bit nervous, but I think I've got a good handle on this topic.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77